How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Block Designs and Finite Projective Planes — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Block Designs and Finite Projective Planes
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Splitting Fields
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The seven translates of form the Fano plane
Example
On the point set , consider the seven triples that is, the translates of modulo .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The seven triples displayed above.
A Steiner triple system is a - design (Steiner triple systems).
A finite projective plane is a finite point-line incidence structure in which every two distinct points lie on exactly one line, every two distinct lines meet in exactly one point, every line contains at least three points, and there exist four points no three collinear (A finite projective plane).
Verification
Each displayed line has three points.
Let . Its nonzero differences are , so every nonzero residue modulo occurs exactly once as with . Therefore any two distinct points of lie in exactly one translate of . By [L1], the seven triples form a Steiner triple system on seven points.
The same difference calculation shows that any two distinct displayed lines meet in exactly one point. The four points contain no displayed line, so no three of them are collinear. Thus the same seven triples, read as lines, satisfy [L2]; every line has three points, so they form a finite projective plane of order . This projective plane is the Fano plane.
The Fano plane has incidence matrix with
Example
Order the Fano lines as and order the points as . Then the point-block incidence matrix is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Fano plane from The seven translates of form the Fano plane.
Every two distinct points of the Fano plane lie on exactly one line (The seven translates of form the Fano plane).
Verification
Each row of has three ones, because each point lies on three of the seven displayed lines. Hence every diagonal entry of is .
Distinct rows of have dot product , because [L1] says that any two distinct points lie on exactly one common line. Hence every off-diagonal entry of is .
Therefore has diagonal entries and off-diagonal entries , so . In particular this example realizes equality in Fisher's inequality, since the plane has points and lines.
Bose's construction at order gives a Steiner triple system on nine points
Example
For , Bose's construction has and point set . Since in , the twelve blocks are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Bose's construction from Bose's construction gives a Steiner triple system of order for .
Verification
The first three displayed blocks are the vertical blocks , and the remaining nine are the blocks for the three unordered pairs , , and and the three layers .
Theorem Bose's construction gives a Steiner triple system of order for therefore applies verbatim and shows that these twelve blocks form a Steiner triple system on nine points.
has points and lines
Example
The finite projective plane has points and lines, and each line contains points.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The projective plane .
is a finite projective plane of order (For every prime power , the space is a projective plane of order ).
A projective plane of order has points and the same number of lines (A finite projective plane of order has points and the same number of lines).
Verification
Applying [L2] with gives points and lines.
The line consists of the one-dimensional subspaces represented by , , , and , so it has projective points, exactly as order predicts.
The squares and on are orthogonal
Example
On , the two squares are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two displayed arrays.
Verification
Reading the two arrays entrywise produces the nine ordered pairs , which are exactly the elements of without repetition.
Therefore the two arrays are orthogonal. This is the instance of The linear Latin squares over are pairwise orthogonal.
The complementary - design is symmetric but not a projective plane
Statement refuted
Every symmetric -design is a projective plane.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The seven Fano lines on from The seven translates of form the Fano plane.
Every projective plane of order is a symmetric - design (A projective plane of order is a symmetric - design).
Counterexample
Let be the family of complements of the seven Fano lines inside the seven-point set . Each member of has size , and there are seven of them.
Fix distinct points . Among the seven displayed Fano lines, exactly one contains both and , and inspection of the list shows that each of and lies on exactly three lines. So exactly five lines meet , and therefore exactly two Fano lines avoid both points. Hence exactly two members of contain , so is a - design.
Since has seven blocks on seven points, it is symmetric. If it were a projective plane, then [L1] would make it a symmetric - design, contradicting step 1.2. Therefore this symmetric design is not a projective plane.
A Latin square need not be orthogonal to an identical copy of itself
Statement refuted
Any two Latin squares of the same order are orthogonal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The addition table of , used twice.
Orthogonality means that every ordered pair of symbols occurs exactly once (Orthogonal Latin squares and complete families of them).
Counterexample
The addition table of is a Latin square, so using it twice gives two Latin squares of the same order.
In the paired array, every cell has the form because the same Latin square is used twice. So the ordered pair never appears, and [L1] shows that the two squares are not orthogonal.