Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 7 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 4 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples make the abstract graded and Hilbert-Samuel constructions computable. They show how Hilbert series are counted in a polynomial ring and a homogeneous quotient, how the associated graded ring records a tangent cone, how Artin-Rees and Krull intersection look in explicit one-variable cases, and how Hilbert-Samuel polynomials and multiplicities appear in DVR, cusp, and finite-length settings.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

The polynomial ring and a homogeneous quotient have the expected Hilbert series and Hilbert polynomial

Example

Let k be a field and give k[x,y] the standard grading. Then HS⁡k[x,y](t)=1(1−t)2, because the degree-n piece has basis xn,xn−1y,…,xyn−1,yn and therefore dimension n+1.

For the homogeneous quotient A:=k[x,y]/(y2), the degree-0 piece has dimension 1 and each degree-n≥1 piece has basis xn,xn−1y. Hence HS⁡A(t)=1+2t+2t2+⋯=1+t1−t, so the Hilbert polynomial of A is the constant polynomial 2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the standard grading on k[x,y], and the quotient A=k[x,y]/(y2).

[L1]

The geometric-series identity ∑n≥0tn=(1−t)−1 and its formal derivative give ∑n≥0(n+1)tn=(1−t)−2.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1givenalgebra

In k[x,y], the degree-n monomials are exactly xn−iyi for 0≤i≤n, so the degree-n piece has dimension n+1. Therefore HS⁡k[x,y](t)=∑n≥0(n+1)tn=1(1−t)2.

1.2givenalgebra

In the quotient by (y2), every monomial containing y2 vanishes. So for n≥1 the degree-n piece is spanned by xn and xn−1y, and these two classes are linearly independent. Hence HS⁡A(t)=1+∑n≥12tn=1+t1−t.

2.1step 1.2

The eventual coefficient sequence of HS⁡A(t) is constant equal to 2, so its Hilbert polynomial is 2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Thus both the polynomial ring and this homogeneous quotient realize the expected Hilbert series and Hilbert polynomial.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

The associated graded ring of a regular local ring and of a cusp local ring can be computed explicitly

Example

Let R1:=k[x,y](x,y) with maximal ideal m=(x,y). Then gr⁡m(R1)≅k[X,Y], because mn/mn+1 has basis given by degree-n monomials in the initial classes of x and y.

For the cusp local ring R2:=k[x,y](x,y)/(y2−x3), the initial form of the relation has degree 2, so gr⁡m(R2)≅k[X,Y]/(Y2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the local rings R1 and R2 above, and the maximal-ideal filtrations.

[L1]

The associated graded ring is gr⁡m(R)=⨁n≥0mn/mn+1 (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1givenalgebra

In R1, the classes of x and y in m/m2 generate every graded piece: the images of the degree-n monomials xn−iyi form a basis of mn/mn+1. Therefore the map k[X,Y]→gr⁡m(R1) sending X,Y to the initial classes of x,y is a graded isomorphism.

1.2L1algebra

In R2, the relation y2−x3 lies in m2 and its lowest-degree term is y2. Hence the only initial relation in degree 2 is Y2=0. As in the remaining monomials Xn and Xn−1Y survive and span the graded pieces, so gr⁡m(R2)≅k[X,Y]/(Y2).

2.1algebra∎

These explicit computations exhibit the regular local and cusp cases.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

An explicit Artin-Rees number can be computed for a submodule inside a finite module

Example

Take R=k[x], I=(x), M=R, and N=(xm) for a fixed integer m≥0. Then for every n≥m, InM∩N=(xn)∩(xm)=(xn)=In−m(ImM∩N). So in this case one may take the Artin-Rees number to be c=m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, an integer m≥0, the ring R=k[x], the ideal I=(x), the module M=R, and the submodule N=(xm).

[L1]

Artin-Rees gives some constant c with InM∩N=In−c(IcM∩N) for all n≥c (Artin-Rees controls intersections of submodules with high ideal powers).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

Here InM=(xn) and N=(xm). If n≥m, then (xn)⊆(xm), so InM∩N=(xn).

1.2algebra

Also ImM∩N=(xm), and therefore for n≥m, In−m(ImM∩N)=(xn−m)(xm)=(xn)=InM∩N.

2.1L1∎

So c=m works, exhibiting an explicit Artin-Rees bound compatible with the abstract existence statement [L1].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-01Open item page →

In a Noetherian local domain, the intersection of the powers of the maximal ideal is zero

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice.

Let (R,m) be a Noetherian local domain. Then ⋂n≥0mn=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a Noetherian local domain (R,m).

[L1]

The Krull intersection theorem says that for a finite module M, ⋂n≥0mnM=0 when m⊆J(R) (The Krull intersection is the (1−a)-torsion submodule, and it vanishes in the Jacobson-radical case).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1given

View R as a finite module over itself. Since (R,m) is local, its maximal ideal lies in the Jacobson radical. Therefore [L1] applies with M=R and gives ⋂n≥0mn=0.

2.1algebra∎

This is the promised local-domain instance of Krull intersection.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

A DVR has Hilbert-Samuel polynomial n+1 and multiplicity one

Example

Let (V,(π)) be a discrete valuation ring. Then χ(π),V(n)=ℓV(V/(πn+1))=n+1 for every n≥0. Hence the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial is exactly n+1, and the Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity is e(π)(V)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A discrete valuation ring V with maximal ideal (π).

[L1]

The quotient V/(πn+1) has length n+1 for every n≥0 (Length and valuation in a DVR).

[L2]

When the Hilbert-Samuel function is explicitly polynomial, multiplicity is its factorial-scaled leading coefficient (Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity as the factorial-scaled leading coefficient).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1given

By [L1], the Hilbert-Samuel function is χ(π),V(n)=ℓV(V/(πn+1))=n+1 for every n≥0.

1.2L2

Therefore the eventual polynomial is already exactly P(n)=n+1. Its degree is 1 and its leading coefficient is 1, so [L2] gives e(π)(V)=1!⋅1=1.

2.1algebra∎

This computes both the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial and the multiplicity of a DVR.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

The Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity of a plane-curve singularity is read from its associated graded ring

Example

Let R:=k[x,y](x,y)/(y2−x3) with maximal ideal m=(x,y)/(y2−x3). Then gr⁡m(R)≅k[X,Y]/(Y2), so the homogeneous piece of degree n≥1 has basis Xn,Xn−1Y and dimension 2. Consequently χm,R(n)=1+∑j=1n2=2n+1 for n≥1, and therefore em(R)=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, the cusp local ring R above, and its maximal ideal m.

[L1]

The associated graded ring packages the quotients mn/mn+1, and the Hilbert-Samuel function is their cumulative length (The associated graded ring and associated graded module of an ideal-adic filtration, The Hilbert-Samuel function and eventual Hilbert-Samuel polynomial of a finite local module).

[L2]

Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity is the leading coefficient scaled by the factorial (Hilbert-Samuel multiplicity as the factorial-scaled leading coefficient).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1givenalgebra

The initial form of y2−x3 has degree 2, namely Y2, so gr⁡m(R)≅k[X,Y]/(Y2). Thus the degree-0 piece has dimension 1, and every degree-n≥1 piece has basis Xn,Xn−1Y.

1.2L1algebra

Therefore ℓR(m0/m)=1 and ℓR(mn/mn+1)=2(n≥1). Summing these lengths as in [L1] gives χm,R(n)=2n+1 for n≥1.

1.3L2

The eventual polynomial is 2n+1, so its degree is 1 and the leading coefficient is 2. Hence [L2] gives em(R)=2.

2.1algebra∎

Thus the multiplicity of the cusp is read directly from its tangent-cone graded ring.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-24 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

In dimension zero the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial is constant and equals the module length

Example

Let (R,m) be a zero-dimensional Noetherian local ring and let M be a finite R-module. Then some power of m annihilates M, so for all sufficiently large n, M/mn+1M≅M. Hence the Hilbert-Samuel polynomial is the constant polynomial Pm,M(n)=ℓR(M).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A zero-dimensional Noetherian local ring (R,m) and a finite R-module M.

[L1]

The length ℓR(M) is defined for finite-length modules (Composition series and length of a module).

[L2]

In a Noetherian ring the nilradical is nilpotent (The nilradical of a Noetherian ring is nilpotent).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L2givenalgebra

In a zero-dimensional local ring every prime ideal is maximal, hence the only prime is m. Its nilradical is therefore m, and [L2] gives mN=0 for some N≥1. Hence for every n≥N−1, M/mn+1M=M.

2.1L1step 1.1algebra

The finite module M has finite length over the zero-dimensional Noetherian local ring: the filtration by powers of the nilpotent maximal ideal has finitely many quotients, each a finite-dimensional vector space over R/m. Thus ℓR(M) is defined by [L1]. Step 1.1 shows that the Hilbert-Samuel function is eventually the constant polynomial ℓR(M), uniquely so because two polynomials agreeing at all large integers are equal.

3.1step 2.1∎

This is exactly the zero-dimensional case.

Sources