How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative smooth triangulation and bundle fitting — examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Countability and Uncountability
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative smooth triangulation and bundle fitting
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
2 · Summary
This companion works the simplest instance of the fitting programme of relative-smooth-triangulation-and-bundle-fitting. For the trivial bundle over two supplied finite corner-adapted triangulations, the product cells form a finite convex cell complex whose compatible triangulation gives an explicit global triangulation (Projection-preserving product triangulation of a trivial smooth bundle). The product map is a homeomorphism with tangent-star differential , so the whole-star hypotheses transfer, and the first-coordinate projection witnesses with the base triangulation unchanged. The example is proved directly and does not invoke the general bundle theorem.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Projection-preserving product triangulation of a trivial smooth bundle
Example
Let and be supplied finite corner-adapted whole-star smooth triangulations (Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting). The trivial bundle has a finite smooth triangulation satisfying for a piecewise affine map , with unchanged. Product corner faces are subpolyhedra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: finite corner-adapted whole-star smooth triangulations and , and the trivial bundle , , in the sense of Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting.
A finite convex cell complex can be triangulated compatibly, with the triangulation subdividing each cell (Finite convex cell complexes admit compatible triangulations).
Whole-star smooth embeddings, corner-adapted triangulations and affine-base projection-preserving diagrams have the meanings fixed in Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting: a map is a whole-star embedding when it is a homeomorphism onto its image and its differential is injective on the whole tangent star, and a projection-preserving diagram for over consists of and a piecewise affine with .
Verification
The cells , with a simplex of and a simplex of , form a finite convex cell complex: the intersection is a product of common faces, hence a common face of . By [F1] there is a finite compatible triangulation of subdividing these cells. Define and . Every simplex of lies in a product cell , so is the restriction of the smooth map and is the restriction of the affine projection onto ; on common faces the two restrictions agree, so is piecewise smooth and is affine on each simplex into a simplex of the original . Pointwise , so with the original unchanged.
The map is a homeomorphism onto because and are homeomorphisms onto their images and is their product; its differential on the tangent star at is , where runs through the tangent cone of a refined simplex contained in , so lies in the cone of the tangent star of at and in . If two tangent-star vectors and have the same product differential, then and . Whole-star injectivity of the two factors gives and ; hence the product differential is injective on the whole tangent star, even after the product-cell subdivision. The corner-face fans of the product are products of those of the factors, and their zero sets are correspondingly products, so the product triangulation is corner adapted; moreover every product face is a union of cells of the triangulation by [F1], so product corner faces are subpolyhedra. Thus is a finite corner-adapted whole-star smooth triangulation with and unchanged, proved directly without invoking the general bundle theorem.