Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Relative smooth triangulation and bundle fitting — examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This companion works the simplest instance of the fitting programme of relative-smooth-triangulation-and-bundle-fitting. For the trivial bundle π:B×N→B over two supplied finite corner-adapted triangulations, the product cells σ×τ form a finite convex cell complex whose compatible triangulation gives an explicit global triangulation (Projection-preserving product triangulation of a trivial smooth bundle). The product map F=(h,g) is a homeomorphism with tangent-star differential (u,v)↦(dh(u),dg(v)), so the whole-star hypotheses transfer, and the first-coordinate projection r=pr⁡1 witnesses πF=hr with the base triangulation h unchanged. The example is proved directly and does not invoke the general bundle theorem.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Projection-preserving product triangulation of a trivial smooth bundle

Example

Let h:D→B and g:L→N be supplied finite corner-adapted whole-star smooth triangulations (Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting). The trivial bundle π:B×N→B has a finite smooth triangulation F:K→B×N satisfying πF=hr for a piecewise affine map r:K→D, with h unchanged. Product corner faces are subpolyhedra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: finite corner-adapted whole-star smooth triangulations h:D→B and g:L→N, and the trivial bundle π:B×N→B, π(b,n)=b, in the sense of Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting.

[F1]

A finite convex cell complex can be triangulated compatibly, with the triangulation subdividing each cell (Finite convex cell complexes admit compatible triangulations).

[F2]

Whole-star smooth embeddings, corner-adapted triangulations and affine-base projection-preserving diagrams have the meanings fixed in Relative smooth triangulations, strong approximation and bundle fitting: a map is a whole-star embedding when it is a homeomorphism onto its image and its differential is injective on the whole tangent star, and a projection-preserving diagram for π over h consists of F and a piecewise affine r with πF=hr.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2givenalgebra

The cells σ×τ, with σ a simplex of D and τ a simplex of L, form a finite convex cell complex: the intersection (σ1×τ1)∩(σ2×τ2)=(σ1∩σ2)×(τ1∩τ2) is a product of common faces, hence a common face of σ1×τ1. By [F1] there is a finite compatible triangulation K of ∣D∣×∣L∣ subdividing these cells. Define F(x,y):=(h(x),g(y)) and r(x,y):=x. Every simplex s of K lies in a product cell σ×τ, so F∣s is the restriction of the smooth map (h∣σ)×(g∣τ) and r∣s is the restriction of the affine projection pr⁡1 onto σ; on common faces the two restrictions agree, so F is piecewise smooth and r is affine on each simplex into a simplex of the original D. Pointwise πF(x,y)=h(x)=h(r(x,y)), so πF=hr with the original h unchanged.

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

The map F is a homeomorphism onto B×N because h and g are homeomorphisms onto their images and F is their product; its differential on the tangent star at (x,y) is (u,v)↦(dhx(u),dgy(v)), where (u,v) runs through the tangent cone of a refined simplex contained in σ×τ, so u lies in the cone σ−x of the tangent star of D at x and v in τ−y. If two tangent-star vectors (u,v) and (u′,v′) have the same product differential, then dhx(u)=dhx(u′) and dgy(v)=dgy(v′). Whole-star injectivity of the two factors gives u=u′ and v=v′; hence the product differential is injective on the whole tangent star, even after the product-cell subdivision. The corner-face fans of the product are products of those of the factors, and their zero sets are correspondingly products, so the product triangulation is corner adapted; moreover every product face σ×τ is a union of cells of the triangulation by [F1], so product corner faces are subpolyhedra. Thus F:K→B×N is a finite corner-adapted whole-star smooth triangulation with πF=hr and h unchanged, proved directly without invoking the general bundle theorem.

Sources