How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach: Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Suprema and Infima
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
The maximum norm on a finite coordinate space admits an explicit norming functional: take the least coordinate of largest modulus and correct its phase. The computation needs neither HB nor an infinite choice principle, and the vector displays nonuniqueness of norming functionals.
The ball example uses relative HB norming for the vector from the centre to an exterior point. The resulting inequalities give a concrete separator and half-gap margin, including radius zero. The numerical instance and has separator level and margin .
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
An explicit norming functional for the finite-dimensional maximum norm
Example
Let and . Equip with . For let be the least index attaining , and put Conjugation is trivial over . Then and . At the zero functional attains the unit-dual-ball norm formula. For , use the unique zero norm on the zero vector space, which has no norm-one functional.
For a displayed nonuniqueness instance, at the distinct functionals and both have norm one and value . This entire finite-coordinate construction works in ZF without assuming HB.
Facts & Assumptions
A finite nonempty list of real numbers has a maximum and minimum (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum).
Every nonempty subset of the natural numbers has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
The dual is the bounded scalar-linear functionals, with norm the supremum of absolute values on the closed unit ball (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).
The norm axioms use absolute homogeneity with the modulus over either field (Real and complex scalar conventions for normed spaces).
Verification
Given: or , , and the displayed coordinate formulas, with the zero-dimensional case treated separately.
For , the finite list has a maximum. It is nonnegative and is zero exactly when each coordinate is zero. For any scalar , , including . Also each , and taking the maximum gives the triangle inequality. These verify that is a norm over either field.
For , the set of maximizing indices in is nonempty. Its least element exists by natural-number well-ordering. Then , so is defined and . The formula satisfies , and . Thus is scalar-linear and bounded, with .
Let have coordinate one in position and zero elsewhere, and put . Then and . Thus , proving . Also .
For any bounded linear of norm at most one and nonzero , ; step 3.1 attains equality. At , every linear gives value zero and the zero functional attains the same maximum. For the vector space has just zero and every linear functional sends it to zero, so the dual has only the zero functional of norm zero; its unit ball is nonempty but it has no norm-one element.
At , . Each coordinate functional satisfies and , so for . Both give , while and , so they are distinct. In dimension one the same displayed construction is , with its norm and value computed in steps 2.1 and 3.1. No extension or infinite selection was used.
Source notes
Brezis Corollary 1.3 and Remark 2, pp.3–4 (finite explicit specialization); Teschl Theorem 4.20 proof, p.116 (norming criterion).
Quantitative separation of a norm ball from an exterior point
Example
Assume HB. Let be a real or complex normed space, , and with . There is with and . For every in the closed ball , The gap between the displayed upper bound and exterior-point value is . Its midpoint gives uniform margin . For the open ball with , the left bound is strict.
Facts & Assumptions
Under HB every nonzero vector has a norm-one functional with value (Relative dual norming, point separation, and recovery of the norm).
Writing , a separator with uniform margin satisfies (Convex sets and continuous real-hyperplane separation in a normed space).
Verification
Given: HB, , , and .
Since , . Apply dual norming to this vector to get and , a positive real. Put . Linearity gives .
If , then . Thus . If with , the same chain gives .
Set and . Direct subtraction and addition give and . Hence step 2.1 gives , the prescribed uniform margin. For , the closed ball is by norm definiteness and these formulas give margin .
For a numerical instance, take , , , , and . Then , , , and . Every satisfies ; at the left bound is attained. This explicitly realizes gap two and margin one.
Source notes
Brezis Corollary 1.3 and Theorem 1.7, pp.3,7 (quantitative specialization); Teschl Theorem 4.20 proof and Corollary 5.4, pp.116,140.