Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

2 results · all verified · 2 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 2 also cleared it.

Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach: Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The maximum norm on a finite coordinate space admits an explicit norming functional: take the least coordinate of largest modulus and correct its phase. The computation needs neither HB nor an infinite choice principle, and the vector (1,1) displays nonuniqueness of norming functionals.

The ball example uses relative HB norming for the vector from the centre to an exterior point. The resulting inequalities give a concrete separator and half-gap margin, including radius zero. The numerical instance [1,1] and 3 has separator level 2 and margin 1.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

An explicit norming functional for the finite-dimensional maximum norm

Example

Let K{R,C} and n1. Equip Kn with y=max1knyk. For x0 let j be the least index attaining x, and put fx(y)=xjxjyj. Conjugation is trivial over R. Then fx(x)=x and fx=1. At x=0 the zero functional attains the unit-dual-ball norm formula. For n=0, use the unique zero norm on the zero vector space, which has no norm-one functional.

For a displayed nonuniqueness instance, at x=(1,1)K2 the distinct functionals f1(y)=y1 and f2(y)=y2 both have norm one and value 1=x. This entire finite-coordinate construction works in ZF without assuming HB.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A finite nonempty list of real numbers has a maximum and minimum (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum).

[F2]

Every nonempty subset of the natural numbers has a least element (The well-ordering principle).

[F3]

The dual is the bounded scalar-linear functionals, with norm the supremum of absolute values on the closed unit ball (The dual space X^* of a normed space and its dual norm).

[F4]

The norm axioms use absolute homogeneity with the modulus over either field (Real and complex scalar conventions for normed spaces).

Verification

Given: K=R or C, n1, and the displayed coordinate formulas, with the zero-dimensional case treated separately.

1.1

For n1, the finite list y1,,yn has a maximum. It is nonnegative and is zero exactly when each coordinate is zero. For any scalar a, maxkayk=amaxkyk, including a=0. Also each yk+zkyk+zky+z, and taking the maximum gives the triangle inequality. These verify that is a norm over either field.

givenF1F4algebra
2.1

For x0, the set of maximizing indices in {1,,n} is nonempty. Its least element j exists by natural-number well-ordering. Then xj=x>0, so c=xj/xj is defined and c=1. The formula fx(y)=cyj satisfies fx(ay+bz)=acyj+bczj=afx(y)+bfx(z), and fx(y)=yjy. Thus fx is scalar-linear and bounded, with fx1.

step 1.1F2F3algebra
3.1

Let ej have coordinate one in position j and zero elsewhere, and put y=(xj/xj)ej. Then y=1 and fx(y)=xjxj/xj2=1. Thus fx1, proving fx=1. Also fx(x)=xjxj/xj=xj=x.

step 2.1F3algebra
4.1

For any bounded linear f of norm at most one and nonzero x, f(x)=xf(x/x)x; step 3.1 attains equality. At x=0, every linear f gives value zero and the zero functional attains the same maximum. For n=0 the vector space has just zero and every linear functional sends it to zero, so the dual has only the zero functional of norm zero; its unit ball is nonempty but it has no norm-one element.

step 3.1F3algebra
5.1

At x=(1,1), x=1. Each coordinate functional satisfies fk(y)=yky and fk(ek)=1, so fk=1 for k=1,2. Both give fk(x)=1, while f1(1,0)=1 and f2(1,0)=0, so they are distinct. In dimension one the same displayed construction is fx(y)=xy/x, with its norm and value computed in steps 2.1 and 3.1. No extension or infinite selection was used.

step 2.1step 3.1F3algebra

Source notes

Brezis Corollary 1.3 and Remark 2, pp.3–4 (finite explicit specialization); Teschl Theorem 4.20 proof, p.116 (norming criterion).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09Open item page →

Quantitative separation of a norm ball from an exterior point

Example

Assume HB. Let X be a real or complex normed space, a,zX, and r0 with d=za>r. There is fX with f=1 and f(za)=d. For every x in the closed ball xar, Ref(x)Ref(a)+r<Ref(z). The gap between the displayed upper bound and exterior-point value is dr>0. Its midpoint b=Ref(a)+(r+d)/2 gives uniform margin ε=(dr)/2. For the open ball with r>0, the left bound is strict.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under HB every nonzero vector v has a norm-one functional with value v (Relative dual norming, point separation, and recovery of the norm).

[F2]

Writing u=Ref, a separator with uniform margin ε>0 satisfies u(x)bε<b+εu(y) (Convex sets and continuous real-hyperplane separation in a normed space).

Verification

Given: HB, a,zX, r0, and d=za>r.

1.1

Since d=za>r0, za0. Apply dual norming to this vector to get f=1 and f(za)=d, a positive real. Put u=Ref. Linearity gives u(z)=u(a)+d.

givenF1algebra
2.1

If xar, then u(x)u(a)=Ref(xa)f(xa)fxar. Thus u(x)u(a)+r<u(a)+d=u(z). If xa<r with r>0, the same chain gives u(x)<u(a)+r.

step 1.1F2algebra
3.1

Set b=u(a)+(r+d)/2 and ε=(dr)/2>0. Direct subtraction and addition give bε=u(a)+r and b+ε=u(a)+d=u(z). Hence step 2.1 gives u(x)bε<b+ε=u(z), the prescribed uniform margin. For r=0, the closed ball is {a} by norm definiteness and these formulas give margin d/2>0.

step 1.1step 2.1F2algebra
4.1

For a numerical instance, take X=R, a=0, r=1, z=3, and f(t)=t. Then f=supt1t=1, d=3, b=2, and ε=1. Every x[1,1] satisfies f(x)=x1=bε<3=b+ε=f(3); at x=1 the left bound is attained. This explicitly realizes gap two and margin one.

step 3.1algebra

Source notes

Brezis Corollary 1.3 and Theorem 1.7, pp.3,7 (quantitative specialization); Teschl Theorem 4.20 proof and Corollary 5.4, pp.116,140.

Sources