How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Independent-pilot cross-entropy proposal fitting and production
Definition
Let be a measure space, let , and let the target probability measure have a pointwise finite measurable density with respect to , so . Let be pointwise finite probability densities with respect to , and write , where is a finite nonempty set equipped with lexicographic order. For each , supply an exact admissibility checker that returns admissible if and only if and the contribution
is integrable under , where for measurable . Supply an initial parameter , a pilot size , and a production size .
- Draw an IID pilot .
- If no lies in , return
pilot-no-hit. - For every , compute
with . Pointwise finiteness rules out , and the piecewise score avoids the undefined product . If all scores equal , return
no-finite-maximizer. Otherwise choose the lexicographically least maximizer among the finite scores and freeze it. - Evaluate . If it returns inadmissible, return
inadmissible-production-proposal. Otherwise draw an IID production sample , independent of the pilot conditional on , and return the ordinary importance-sampling estimate using the piecewise-defined contribution above.
The finite candidate set makes the score comparisons and tie rule deterministic. The supplied exact checker is an input oracle; the procedure does not infer support or integrability from a pilot fit. If its check fails, no production estimate or unbiasedness or finite-variance claim is returned.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Patrick Laub, Algorithms for Rare Event Estimation, Short Course, Lecture 2, Cross-Entropy Method (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gino Biondini, An Introduction to Rare Event Simulation and Importance Sampling, Handbook of Statistics 33, Chapter 2, `5 (standard reference, not scraped)