How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Drift-implicit Euler–Maruyama with explicit solve-failure status
Definition
Assume AC and the Brownian conventions of Locally Lipschitz Itô SDE on an open state domain on with . An admissible mathematical input has finite dimensions , , with , an autonomous continuous drift , a finite-valued Borel diffusion , and a finite -measurable initial state . It also has a constant such that This global condition is a precondition on the mathematical input, not a runtime test over all . For , set and let , which is defined uniquely on all of by Backward Euler has a globally defined nonexpansive resolvent (contractive when strongly dissipative).
First check that are positive integers, is finite and positive,
is a positive integer, , and is finite. If any of
these checks fails, return invalid-input. An exact execution then sets
and, for , computes
It returns the grid values, the left-endpoint step process
and the continuous interpolation
This is a pathwise continuous extension of the grid values. At each shared
endpoint the interpolation agrees with the grid update.
A finite implementation may instead receive a root-solver interface and
an integer work cap . Each call must terminate after at
most declared solver iterations and return either
certified-root(z, proof) or no-certificate(last-iterate, residual) (with
last-iterate = null if the cap permits no iterate). The
supplied exact verifier must terminate and accepts a certificate precisely when it proves that
is finite and . At the first call returning
no-certificate, or at the first certificate rejected by the verifier, stop
and return solve-failure with zero-based failed index , the valid grid prefix through
, the step process on , the interpolation on , and the
solver diagnostic. For no-certificate, retain its last iterate and residual;
for a rejected certificate with candidate , report and residual
. If the diagnostic has no finite candidate, its iterate and
residual are null. Do not assign or continue. A
verified root equals by uniqueness. If every call is verified,
return success and the exact grid, step process, and interpolation above.
The global dissipativity condition remains an admissibility precondition and
is not tested by these finite-value checks. Thus a failed finite solve records
failure of certification, not absence of a mathematical root.
The algorithm makes no convergence or mean-square stability claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Desmond J. Higham, Xuerong Mao and Andrew M. Stuart, Strong convergence of Euler-type methods for nonlinear stochastic differential equations, §5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Martin Hutzenthaler, Arnulf Jentzen and Peter E. Kloeden, Strong convergence of an explicit numerical method for SDEs with nonglobally Lipschitz continuous coefficients, equation (6) (standard reference, not scraped)