Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Drift-implicit Euler–Maruyama with explicit solve-failure status

Definition

Assume AC and the Brownian conventions of Locally Lipschitz Itô SDE on an open state domain on [0,T] with U=Rd. An admissible mathematical input has finite dimensions d,m≥1, T>0, N≥1 with h=T/N≤1, an autonomous continuous drift b:Rd→Rd, a finite-valued Borel diffusion σ:Rd→Rd×m, and a finite F0-measurable initial state ξ. It also has a constant μ≥0 such that ⟨x−y,b(x)−b(y)⟩≤−μ∣x−y∣2(x,y∈Rd). This global condition is a precondition on the mathematical input, not a runtime test over all x,y. For h>0, set Hh(x)=x−hb(x) and let Rh=Hh−1, which is defined uniquely on all of Rd by Backward Euler has a globally defined nonexpansive resolvent (contractive when strongly dissipative).

First check that d,m are positive integers, T is finite and positive, N is a positive integer, 0<h=T/N≤1, and ξ is finite. If any of these checks fails, return invalid-input. An exact execution then sets Y0=ξ and, for n=0,…,N−1, computes un=Yn+σ(Yn)(Wtn+1−Wtn),Yn+1=Rh(un). It returns the grid values, the left-endpoint step process Yˉt=Yn(tn≤t<tn+1),YˉT=YN, and the continuous interpolation Yt=Yn+(t−tn)b(Yn+1)+σ(Yn)(Wt−Wtn),tn≤t≤tn+1. This is a pathwise continuous extension of the grid values. At each shared endpoint the interpolation agrees with the grid update.

A finite implementation may instead receive a root-solver interface S and an integer work cap M≥0. Each call S(Hh,un,M) must terminate after at most M declared solver iterations and return either certified-root(z, proof) or no-certificate(last-iterate, residual) (with last-iterate = null if the cap permits no iterate). The supplied exact verifier must terminate and accepts a certificate precisely when it proves that z∈Rd is finite and Hh(z)=un. At the first call returning no-certificate, or at the first certificate rejected by the verifier, stop and return solve-failure with zero-based failed index n, the valid grid prefix through Yn, the step process on [0,tn], the interpolation on [0,tn], and the solver diagnostic. For no-certificate, retain its last iterate and residual; for a rejected certificate with candidate z, report z and residual Hh(z)−un. If the diagnostic has no finite candidate, its iterate and residual are null. Do not assign Yn+1 or continue. A verified root equals Rh(un) by uniqueness. If every call is verified, return success and the exact grid, step process, and interpolation above. The global dissipativity condition remains an admissibility precondition and is not tested by these finite-value checks. Thus a failed finite solve records failure of certification, not absence of a mathematical root. The algorithm makes no convergence or mean-square stability claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources