Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Global existence and finite-horizon moments for one-sided Lipschitz SDEs

Statement

Assume AC. Let d,m≥1 be finite, T>0, and let W and ξ satisfy the filtered Brownian hypotheses in Locally Lipschitz Itô SDE on an open state domain with U=Rd. Consider the autonomous SDE dXt=b(Xt) dt+σ(Xt) dWt,X0=ξ, where b∈C1(Rd;Rd), σ:Rd→Rd×m is globally Lipschitz, and for constants L,C<∞ and an integer q≥1, ⟨x−y,b(x)−b(y)⟩≤L∣x−y∣2,∥Db(x)∥≤C(1+∣x∣q). Suppose E∣ξ∣p<∞ for every finite p≥1. Then the maximal local strong solution is global on [0,T], is unique up to indistinguishability, and for every finite p≥1, Esup⁡0≤t≤T∣Xt∣p<∞. The bound may depend on p,T, the coefficient constants, and the initial moments. No global Lipschitz condition on the drift is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the locally Lipschitz SDE data, one-sided Lipschitz drift, polynomial derivative bound, globally Lipschitz diffusion, and all finite initial moments in the Statement.

[F1]

The stopped local strong solution exists uniquely up to exit from compact subsets of the open state domain; if its lifetime is finite, the exhaustion Kn records exit from every compact subset. Local strong existence and uniqueness up to exit for locally Lipschitz SDEs

[F2]

For V∈C1,2 and a continuous Brownian Itô process, Itô's formula has drift ∂tV+∇V⋅b+12(σσT):D2V. Multidimensional Ito formula for Brownian-driven processes

[F3]

For a predictable matrix integrand G and p≥2, Esup⁡t≤T∣∫0tGs dWs∣p≤Cp,dE(∫0T∥Gs∥F2ds)p/2. Lp maximal moment bound for Brownian Itô integrals

[F4]

A finite-energy Itô integral has mean zero and its second moment equals the expected coefficient energy. Ito isometry and linearity in predictable L2

[F6]

Hölder's integral inequality gives (∫0Tf(s)ds)p≤Tp−1∫0Tf(s)pds for nonnegative measurable f and p≥1. Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases

[F7]

Fatou's lemma passes uniform stopped nonnegative moment bounds to an almost sure limit. Fatou's lemma

[F8]

If u(t)≤A+∫0tBu(s)ds with nonnegative continuous u and constants A,B≥0, then u(t)≤AeBt. Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients

[F9]

Dominated convergence gives continuity of uR(t)=EVp(Xt∧τR): the stopped paths are continuous and Vp(Xt∧τR)≤Vp(ξ)+(1+R2)p/2. Dominated convergence

[F10]

Tonelli's theorem interchanges expectation and time integration for the nonnegative measurable function Vp(Xs∧τR). Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product

[A1]

AC is inherited through the local Brownian and Itô interfaces; no choice is used to stop, localize, or pass to limits. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

Given: The assumptions and suppliers in the Statement and Facts.

1.1F2F5givenalgebra

For p≥2 define Vp(x)=(1+∣x∣2)p/2. Direct differentiation gives ∇Vp=p(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1x and D2Vp=p(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1I+p(p−2)(1+∣x∣2)p/2−2xxT. Thus ∥D2Vp(x)∥≤Cp(1+∣x∣2)p/2−1. The one-sided Lipschitz condition with y=0 and [F5] imply ⟨x,b(x)⟩≤L∣x∣2+∣b(0)∣∣x∣≤C0(1+∣x∣2). Global Lipschitz continuity gives ∥σ(x)∥F2≤C1(1+∣x∣2). Substitution into the generator formula [F2] yields ∇Vp(x)⋅b(x)+12(σσT):D2Vp(x)≤CpVp(x).

2.1F2F4F8F9F10step 1.1given

For integer R≥1, stop the maximal solution at its first exit τR from {∣x∣<R}, or at its lifetime if earlier; for U=Rd these are the compact-exhaustion stops. If ∣ξ∣≥R, then τR=0 and the stopped integrands vanish. Otherwise all active states lie in B‾R, so the coefficients, derivatives of Vp, and Itô integrand are bounded and the stochastic integral in [F2] has mean zero by the Itô isometry. The integrable bound in [F9] makes uR(t)=EVp(Xt∧τR) continuous, as required by [F8]. Taking expectations in Itô's formula, using step 1.1 and Tonelli [F10], gives uR(t)≤EVp(ξ)+Cp∫0tuR(s) ds. Applying [F8] gives sup⁡Rsup⁡t≤TEVp(Xt∧τR)≤EVp(ξ)eCpT<∞.

3.1F1F7step 2.1given

Set ER={sup⁡t≤T∣Xt∧τR∣≥R}. On ER, either ∣ξ∣≥R and τR=0, or the continuous path reaches radius R and is stopped there; hence ∣XT∧τR∣≥R. Step 2.1 therefore gives Rp P(ER)≤EVp(XT∧τR)≤EVp(ξ)eCpT. If a maximal path fails to extend as a solution through T, it must reach every radius by T: otherwise it agrees with a globally defined truncation whose cutoff is one on a larger ball containing that path, giving an extension by local uniqueness. Thus the failure event is contained in every ER and has probability zero as R→∞. The solution extends globally through T, and Fatou's lemma [F7] applied at each time to the stopped bounds gives sup⁡t≤TEVp(Xt)<∞.

4.1A1F1F3F6F7step 3.1givenalgebra∎

The derivative bound and the fundamental theorem of calculus on the segment from 0 to x give ∣b(x)∣≤C2(1+∣x∣q+1); global Lipschitz continuity gives ∥σ(x)∥F≤C3(1+∣x∣). For each p≥2, applying step 3.1 at moments p(q+1) and p therefore implies E(∫0T∣b(Xs)∣ds)p<∞,E(∫0T∥σ(Xs)∥F2ds)p/2<∞, by Hölder's integral inequality [F6]. The integral equation gives sup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣p≤3p−1(∣ξ∣p+(∫0T∣b(Xs)∣ds)p+sup⁡t≤T∣∫0tσ(Xs)dWs∣p). The first two expectations are finite by the hypothesis and the preceding bound; [F3] bounds the last by the diffusion-energy moment already shown finite. For 1≤p<2, Hölder's inequality [F6] on the probability space gives Esup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣p≤(Esup⁡t≤T∣Xt∣2)p/2. Uniqueness is the local uniqueness in [F1], and AC is exactly [A1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources