How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-grid conformal risk control
Definition
Input a deterministic ordered grid with , a calibration size , a bound , a target , and calibration losses for and . Also supply the prediction rule associated with each grid point. For in order, compute Return at the first index for which . If no index passes, return . Monotonicity and the endpoint-safety assumption from the finite nested decision family are hypotheses for the risk theorem, not checks of the unobserved test loss.
Definition references
Finite nested decision families and bounded risk: the grid, bounded loss array, loss-nesting convention, endpoint-safety condition, and marginal expected test risk.
Angelopoulos et al., Conformal Risk Control, §1.1, equation (4)
Depends on
Used by
- A nonmonotone loss can defeat first-pass calibration Counterexample
- Fallback when the calibration correction exceeds the target Example
- Multilabel false-negative risk control Example
- The all-zero loss boundary Example
- Finite-grid risk control by monotone envelopes Theorem
- Finite-sample expected-risk control on a finite grid Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anastasios N. Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Adam Fisch, Lihua Lei, and Tal Schuster, Conformal Risk Control, arXiv:2208.02814v4 (standard reference, not scraped)