Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Interval Krawczyk linear system certifier with explicit statuses

Definition

Input n≥1, a nonempty family of square matrices A and right-hand sides b enclosed by finite complex rectangles, a closed complex rectangle box X⊂Cn, a point x0∈X, and dyadic point matrices R,S∈Cn×n with exact identities RS=SR=I. The witness S establishes that R is nonsingular. No independence assumption on the actual family is required beyond its inclusion in the input boxes.

  1. Outward-evaluate, over the full family boxes and x∈X, the Krawczyk expression
K=x0−R(Ax0−b)+(I−RA)(X−x0).

If any interval operation is not finite and defined, return inconclusive.

  1. Compare the resulting enclosing rectangle box with X by exact endpoint comparisons. If it is not contained in X, return inconclusive. Otherwise outward-bound the maximum row sum of ∣I−RA∣ uniformly over the family by a number q. If this norm bound cannot be enclosed finitely, return existence-certified with uniqueness-inconclusive and no defect bound. If it is finite, return existence-certified; attach unique-certified for each fixed pair if the outward comparison certifies q<1, and otherwise attach uniqueness-inconclusive.

The enclosure in step 1 may be wider than the exact set of Krawczyk values; only successful inclusion produces a claim. A failed inclusion or a failed norm bound does not imply singularity.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources