How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Krawczyk inclusion gives solutions and contraction gives uniqueness
Statement
Let , let and be nonempty, let be a nonempty closed complex rectangle box in , let , and let the point matrix be nonsingular. For each fixed , define
and
If , then every admitted pair has a solution in . If in addition a number satisfies for every , that solution is unique in for each fixed pair.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The families, box, center, and nonsingular in the statement.
Every continuous self-map of a closed box has a fixed point (Brouwer fixed points exist on every nonempty closed box).
The complex infinity matrix norm is compatible with multiplication by vectors (The complex infinity matrix norm is compatible and submultiplicative).
The vector infinity norm is the maximum coordinate modulus (The complex induced infinity matrix norm).
Proof
Fix any . Algebra gives , so implies . The affine map is continuous on the closed box, so [F1] gives a fixed point . Since is nonsingular, is equivalent to .
If both solve the same system, then both are fixed points and . By [F2] and [F3], . Since the vector infinity norm [F3] vanishes only at the zero vector and , . This proves uniqueness for that pair; the pair was arbitrary.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Siegfried M. Rump, Verification methods: Rigorous results using floating-point arithmetic, Acta Numerica 19 (2010), §§10.5–10.6 (standard reference, not scraped)