How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Exact linear-Gaussian Kalman filter
Definition
Fix a finite horizon , positive state dimensions , and positive observation dimensions . The input is a linear-Gaussian model from Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises, with matrices and , initial mean , and symmetric positive-semidefinite covariances . Its state and observation equations are where and are centered and mutually independent across all times and of .
The admissible data are vectors for which every innovation covariance encountered below is positive definite. Positive definite means for every nonzero . The algorithm returns predicted and updated means and covariances and the innovation and gain at each time. Initialize For , perform:
- Predict:
- Form the innovation and its covariance:
- Factor with lower-triangular having positive diagonal, using A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique. Solve and by triangular solves. This defines , hence , without explicitly forming .
- Update:
For the loop is empty and the returned pair is . No inverse of , , or is used. This item defines the procedure and makes no complexity, rounding-error, or numerical-stability claim.
Depends on
- Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises
- Filtering, predictive, and smoothing laws in a finite-horizon state-space model
- Forward and backward substitution for triangular linear systems
- A matrix admits a Cholesky factorisation with positive diagonal exactly when it is Hermitian positive definite, and that factor is unique
Used by
- Finite-horizon square-root Kalman filter by rectangular factors and QR Algorithm
- Rauch–Tung–Striebel fixed-interval Gaussian smoother Algorithm
- A one-step scalar Kalman update Example
- A rounded subtractive covariance update can become indefinite Example
- Exact two-time scalar Rauch–Tung–Striebel smoothing calculation Example
- Scalar Gaussian 3DVAR returns the exact analysis mean Example
- Singular forecast covariance lies outside the ordinary RTS inverse domain Example
- Singular prior covariance with positive innovation variance Example
- Independent perturbed-observation reference members follow the Kalman filter Lemma
- The backward Gaussian kernel remains valid after future observations Lemma
- The Kalman filter is exact conditional on a nonlinear path Lemma
- The 3DVAR quadratic has the Gaussian MAP and Kalman analysis update Theorem
- The finite-horizon linear-Gaussian Kalman filter is exact Theorem
- The perturbed-observation EnKF converges to the Kalman filter at fixed horizon Theorem
- The Rauch–Tung–Striebel recursion gives fixed-interval Gaussian smoothing laws Theorem
- The square-root filter has an explicit conditioned finite-horizon error bound Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Simo Särkkä, Bayesian Filtering and Smoothing, Chapter 4, §§4.1–4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Kody Law, Andrew M. Stuart, and Konstantinos Zygalakis, Data Assimilation: A Mathematical Introduction, Chapter 4, §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)