How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kauffman bracket state sum
Definition
The input is a nonempty unoriented regular link diagram : a finite immersed planar projection of one or more circles with finitely many transverse double points, no triple points, and over/under data at each double point. Let be its finite crossing set. At each crossing take the local chart in which the over-strand runs southwest to northeast and is drawn continuously over the under-strand, which runs northwest to southeast with a gap at the intersection. The A-smoothing joins the two left endpoints and the two right endpoints, with weight ; the B-smoothing joins the two top endpoints and the two bottom endpoints, with weight . These labels are transported with orientation-preserving changes of local coordinates. Put . The output is the Laurent polynomial .
- Set an accumulator in .
- For each function , smooth every crossing according to , obtaining a crossingless diagram with circles. Count the A- and B-smoothings as and , and replace
- Return after all states have been processed.
The input is a mathematical diagram object, not a serialized string. The procedure specifies no parsing or malformed-string rejection behavior. Since the diagram has at least one component, every complete smoothing has and every exponent of is nonnegative.
Definition references
Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value
Kauffman, An Invariant of Regular Isotopy (1990), §III, printed pp. 430–432
Kauffman, Combinatorial Knot Theory and the Jones Polynomial (2022), §2
Roberts, Knots Knotes (1999), §4.3
Funar, A Crash Course in Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds, Chapter 3, §1.1
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Louis H. Kauffman, An Invariant of Regular Isotopy, Transactions of the AMS 318(2) (1990), §III, printed pp. 430–432 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Louis H. Kauffman, Combinatorial Knot Theory and the Jones Polynomial, arXiv:2204.12104v2, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Justin Roberts, Knots Knotes, §§4.1 and 4.3, printed pp. 21 and 24–25 (standard reference, not scraped)
- François Funar, A Crash Course in Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds, Chapter 3, §1.1 (standard reference, not scraped)