How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Kauffman bracket R2 and R3 identities
Statement
Let be an indeterminate and . In a vertical -strand braid box whose longitudinal parameter increases from bottom to top, let be the straight tangle and, for , let be the cup-cap tangle with a cap at the top and a cup at the bottom on strands , and straight strands elsewhere. Each closed loop has value . For the positive crossing, use positive projection coordinates , with longitudinal and transverse, and over and under tangent vectors and for . Transport the source chart by : its A-smoothing is the left/right pairing with coefficient , giving , and its B-smoothing is the top/bottom pairing with coefficient , giving . Set For the opposite crossing, the smoothings exchange their through and cup-cap pairings; set Then , and for adjacent strands Consequently the bracket is unchanged by every local Reidemeister II or III replacement; arbitrary strand orientations do not change these unoriented tangle identities.
The picture names the cap, cup, and through strand that define ; the algebraic equalities above are proved below without using the picture as an inference.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A regular link diagram with one of the local R2 or R3 replacements described in the statement.
In the source crossing chart, the A-smoothing has weight , the B-smoothing has weight , and a closed trivial loop has value (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).
The identity is the vertical through tangle; is the cap on top and cup on bottom, stacking removes loops with coefficient , and the stacking product is associative and bilinear (Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules, Stacking is associative and horizontal juxtaposition is strict monoidal).
The generators satisfy , , , and distant generators commute (The elementary diagram generators satisfy the local Temperley–Lieb relations).
R2 creates or deletes two opposite crossings, and every allowed R3 has a strict height order with the cyclic over/under pattern excluded (Oriented Reidemeister moves).
Proof
Use source coordinates with their standard positive orientation and positive projection coordinates on the braid box. For , the map has determinant . It sends the source over direction to and the source under direction to , whose determinant is . The source left/right pairs have constant , hence constant braid position and give the through pairing ; the source top/bottom pairs have constant , hence constant braid time and give the cup-cap . The displayed page coordinates reverse the positive projection orientation; their visual quarter-turn is not the orientation comparison. For the opposite crossing, rotating the source chart by a positive quarter-turn exchanges the two endpoint pairings, so its A/B smoothings are respectively and . By [F1] these expansions are and . Using [F2] and [F3], The same multiplication in the other order gives , since both factors are polynomials in . Thus the two opposite crossings in an R2 pair cancel in either order.
Put and . Expanding and using [F3] gives while interchanging and gives Their difference is . Hence the two sides of the braid-like R3 move have equal bracket operators.
Near the three-strand event, choose a linear longitudinal coordinate nonzero on each of the three tangent lines, shrink the event disk, and orient the unoriented local tracks in its increasing direction. All three tracks are then monotone; these temporary arrows do not affect the bracket. Label the tracks at the incoming end. The two R3 sides meet their pairs in orders and , and a strict height order permits exactly the exponent triples . The triples and would require a cyclic height order. Put and . Besides from step 1.2 and its inverse from step 1.1, the four needed identities are The first follows by multiplying on the left by and on the right by ; the second follows by multiplying on the left by and on the right by ; the last two are their inverses. Thus each of the six height orders gives equality with exactly its actual over/under choices. For R2, choose a longitudinal coordinate along the common tangent at the bigon event, shrink the disk, and temporarily orient both tracks increasingly; the two local crossings have opposite types and cancel by step 1.1. Reversing any original strand arrow leaves all smoothing weights unchanged. Adjoining the unchanged exterior tangle and closing its boundary preserves these equalities: expand each crossing into its two smoothings, use bilinearity, and evaluate each resulting crossingless closed diagram with one factor per circle as in [F2]. This gives equal sums on the two sides. Every complete smoothing of the nonempty diagram has , and is nonzero in the integral domain ; hence these sums are and . Cancelling proves , so every R2/R3 variant preserves the bracket.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Louis H. Kauffman, An Invariant of Regular Isotopy, Transactions of the AMS 318(2) (1990), §III, printed pp. 430–432 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Louis H. Kauffman, Combinatorial Knot Theory and the Jones Polynomial, arXiv:2204.12104v2, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Justin Roberts, Knots Knotes, §4.1, printed pp. 21–22 (standard reference, not scraped)
- François Funar, A Crash Course in Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds, Chapter 3, §1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)