How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Computed Clenshaw–Curtis from an even-extension DFT
Definition
Input real numbers , a natural , sampled values , and the phase/FFT controls for Arbitrary-length mixed-radix and Bluestein DFT: a phase tolerance (required to be exact rational when ), integer dyadic exponent limits , and integers , , , and . Set and . For an underlying , admissible samples satisfy when and for when , using the canonical real images of The canonical natural of a field. When , also require every to lie in the representable real set of the same floating-point model instance used by the called DFT; this ensures its complex input coordinates satisfy that procedure's input condition. No representability condition is needed for , when no DFT call is made. The output is an approximate real quadrature value or the first status returned by the called DFT procedure.
- If , return , the midpoint convention of Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature with the midpoint zero-degree case.
- If , form by for and for . This is the even extension , with real samples embedded as complex numbers with zero imaginary part. Call Arbitrary-length mixed-radix and Bluestein DFT on with length and the same controls . If it returns a status instead of a vector, return that status.
- Otherwise, take the real parts of output entries , form the DCT-I coefficients , , and for as in Type-I cosine transform for Chebyshev–Lobatto data, and return with the exact moments in Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature with the midpoint zero-degree case.
The postprocessing is exact real arithmetic applied to the approximate DFT output. The procedure makes no end-to-end floating-point error or stability claim; it only propagates the DFT routine's declared failure statuses.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lloyd N. Trefethen, Is Gauss Quadrature Better than Clenshaw–Curtis?, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)