How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Type-I cosine transform for Chebyshev–Lobatto data
Definition
Let with and let . In real-valued formulas, each natural index denotes its canonical real image (The canonical natural of a field). Since by Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, division by is defined in (The reals form a field). The type-I discrete cosine transform, in the Lobatto convention used here, is the vector defined by Here is the natural power of the real number from Integer powers , and the sum is the finite sum of Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, empty when . The data are ordered from the right endpoint toward the left endpoint at nodes . This definition fixes the unnormalised DCT-I convention; the transform is not defined at .
Depends on
Used by
- Computed Clenshaw–Curtis from an even-extension DFT Algorithm
- Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature with the midpoint zero-degree case Definition
- Three-point Clenshaw–Curtis integration of a quadratic Example
- Weighted cosine orthogonality on the Lobatto grid Lemma
- DCT-I coefficients of the Chebyshev–Lobatto interpolant Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
37 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lloyd N. Trefethen, Is Gauss Quadrature Better than Clenshaw–Curtis?, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- L. Ridgway Scott, Numerical Analysis, 2nd ed., §13.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)