How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature with the midpoint zero-degree case
Definition
Let , , , , and . For , set on , let , and form from the DCT-I coefficients in DCT-I coefficients of the Chebyshev–Lobatto interpolant. With the Chebyshev moments of Exact integrals of Chebyshev polynomials, define For , define instead the midpoint rule. This is the explicit endpoint and zero-degree convention for Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature. The sums and coefficients are exact real quantities; finite-precision evaluation is a separate algorithm.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lloyd N. Trefethen, Is Gauss Quadrature Better than Clenshaw–Curtis?, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- L. Ridgway Scott, Numerical Analysis, 2nd ed., §13.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)