How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Segmented Taylor LCU simulator
Definition
Inputs: A finite list on a nonzero finite-dimensional complex system space, where , and each is a supplied Hermitian unitary; real time and a tolerance , each with a finite exact description. The description of supplies arbitrarily tight rational interval enclosures. Also supply the complete PREPARE/SELECT, inverse, and cost interfaces from LCU decomposition and access model for the Taylor list selected below. For the certified procedure the real descriptions supply arbitrarily tight rational interval enclosures for and , where . Exact coefficient phases and the required unitary/circuit access for the selected list are separate supplied data; interval names alone do not provide them. Arithmetic, refinement, description and generation costs are charged separately. No efficient classical compiler is asserted.
For the indexed term-query implementation, additionally supply the complete unitary for , acting as identity at padded term indices, together with every controlled or inverse form actually used and its separate costs. A call to this coherent multiplexer is one indexed term query. Individual accesses to the separate do not grant this operation: when it is assembled from individual controlled , each multiplexed call uses equality-controlled individual calls, and all label tests, routing, phase gates and work are charged. With an independently supplied Taylor SELECT, only its declared internal resource record applies.
Procedure:
- Refine an enclosure of until and . Refine an enclosure of , intersecting with the known nonnegative half-line, until its width is less than . If , return the exact identity circuit with no oracle calls and the certificate . Otherwise proceed to the segmented branch; no positive lower bound on is needed. These refinements terminate because and the supplied descriptions give arbitrarily tight rational enclosures. No exact equality test on interval-described reals is used; every or input takes the identity branch.
- In the remaining branch put . In the ideal exact-arithmetic variant set . In the certified variant refine an enclosure until its width is less than , then set . Either choice has , , and . Set and . All refinement and segment-count costs are recorded.
- Set , a positive rational lower bound for . Set and successively double until the exact rational comparison holds; compute the factorial by finite integer multiplication and set . This finite scheduler has no real-equality test or unbounded refinement at a fixed failed order. Since , the tail in Taylor simulation tail bound is at most . Its factorial estimate gives the stated logarithmic-over-double-logarithmic order, including the factor of at most two from doubling. Charge the factorial and coefficient arithmetic.
- Expand into the ordered product-term LCU list of Finite Taylor LCU polynomial. The certificate and Taylor simulation tail bound prove analytically. Add two distinct identity terms with , retaining zero-weight padding labels if needed; the matrix is unchanged and the listed norm is exactly . Under the indexed term-query implementation, implement each Taylor SELECT using at most controlled indexed term queries: process tuple positions from down to , condition each call on a valid tuple having that position, and use its term label. Compute/uncompute those labels in charged work registers. This reverse execution order yields the displayed product . Apply the coefficient phase separately and act as identity on padding and unused labels. The adjoint SELECT reverses this sequence and uses the declared inverse calls.
- For each of the segments, allocate a fresh clean register containing the expanded-term index and every PREPARE work wire. Build using the exact coefficient phases and the padded invalid-index behavior. Apply the phase-corrected chronological circuit , with on the complete clean coefficient/work register. Thus the segment unitary is , with two reflection calls, two forward calls, and one inverse call.
- Compose the segment circuits in time order. Retain every segment's coefficient/work register in the output dilation; do not measure or claim exact cleanup. The output is the finite unitary/access-circuit description together with the chosen , coefficient table or generator, and resource record.
The default procedure is uncontrolled. A controlled variant is defined only when controlled access to every component is supplied; the known minus sign is applied as a phase on the outer control, not discarded. If a compiled implementation is used, the per-call operator-norm error bounds must satisfy the certified sum . The exact-access variant has . Every PREPARE, SELECT, inverse, reflection, control, coefficient, table, precision, wire, and gate cost remains explicit.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, Chapter 28 §28.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, §9.3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)