Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Taylor simulation tail bound

Statement

Let H=∑j<majVj be a finite-dimensional self-adjoint Hamiltonian on a nonzero complex-inner-product space, with m≥1, written with real aj and Hermitian unitaries Vj, and set Λ=∑j∣aj∣. For real h, integer K≥0, and x=Λ∣h∣, ∥MK(h)−e−ihH∥≤exxK+1(K+1)!. The Taylor coefficient sum sK=∑k=0Kxk/k! satisfies sK≤ex≤2 when x≤ln⁡2. If 0<η<1 and x≤ln⁡2, there is a K=O ⁣(1+log⁡(1/η)log⁡log⁡(e+1/η)) for which the right-hand side is at most η.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero finite-dimensional complex-inner-product space, the stated self-adjoint decomposition, real h, and K≥0.

[L1]

Finite Taylor LCU polynomial: MK(h)=∑k=0K(−ihH)k/k!, and Λ=∑j∣aj∣.

[L2]

Finite Hermitian matrix dynamics: e−ihH is defined by the finite spectral functional calculus on the eigenvalues of H.

[F3]

The inner-product norm is definite, homogeneous, and satisfies the triangle inequality: the induced inner-product norm is homogeneous and satisfies the triangle inequality.

[F4]
[F7]

The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function and The exponential function is strictly increasing: exp⁡(ln⁡2)=2, and x≤ln⁡2 implies ex≤2.

Proof

Given: As in Facts & Assumptions.

1.1givenL1L2F1F2F3F4algebra

By [F1], choose an orthonormal eigenbasis of H with eigenvalues λ. For a unit eigenvector uλ, ∣λ∣=∥Huλ∥=∥∑jajVjuλ∥≤∑j∣aj∣∥Vjuλ∥=Λ by [F2]–[F4]. On this basis, [L1] and [L2] make the difference diagonal with scalar entries ∑k=0K(−ihλ)k/k!−exp⁡(−ihλ).

1.2givenL1F5F7algebra

Since x≥0, the finite Taylor coefficient sum obeys 0≤sK=∑k=0Kxk/k!≤∑k=0∞xk/k!=ex by [L1] and [F5]. If x≤ln⁡2, [F7] gives sK≤ex≤2.

2.1step 1.1F4F5F6algebra

Put n=K+1. The absolute scalar-series tail at eigenvalue λ is at most ∑k=n∞(∣h∣∣λ∣)k/k!. Writing k=n+j and using (n+j)!≥n!j! bounds this by (∣h∣∣λ∣)n/n!∑j=0∞(∣h∣∣λ∣)j/j!=e∣h∣∣λ∣(∣h∣∣λ∣)n/n! by [F5]–[F6]. If the diagonal error has entries di in the eigenbasis and z=∑iziui, then its squared output norm is ∑i∣di∣2∣zi∣2≤(max⁡i∣di∣)2∥z∥2; an eigenbasis vector attaining the finite maximum gives equality in the operator norm [F4]. Hence the operator norm is max⁡i∣di∣. Since 0≤∣h∣∣λi∣≤x, the monotonicity of eu and un on nonnegative reals gives e∣h∣∣λi∣∣h∣n∣λi∣n/n!≤exxn/n!. Taking the maximum proves the stated tail bound.

3.1givenstep 2.1F5F7algebra∎

Assume x≤ln⁡2, so ex≤2 by [F7]. Let L=ln⁡(1/η). The exponential series gives 2<e<3: its first two terms sum to 2, while 1/k!≤2−(k−1) for k≥2, with strict inequality for k≥3, so the remaining sum is less than 1. Thus exp⁡(0)=1<2<exp⁡(1)=e by [F5], and the strict increase and inverse relation in [F7] give 0<ln⁡2<1. If L<1, n=10 gives 2x10/10!<2/10!<1/3<e−1<η. If L≥1, take n=⌈16eL/ln⁡(e+L)⌉. For z≥1, g(z)=z−ln⁡z has derivative g′(z)=(z−2)/(2z), so it decreases up to z=4 and increases thereafter. Since e>2, exp⁡(2)=e2>4, hence ln⁡4<2 by [F7]; thus g(z)≥g(4)=2−ln⁡4>0. Also e+L<4L. Therefore ne≥16Lln⁡(e+L)≥16Le+L>4e+L, so ln⁡(n/e)>12ln⁡(e+L). Hence nln⁡(n/e)≥8eL≥L+ln⁡4, using e>2, L≥1, and ln⁡4<2. For the factorial estimate, monotonicity of ln⁡s gives ln⁡(n!)=∑k=1nln⁡k≥∫1nln⁡s ds=nln⁡n−n+1, so n!≥(n/e)n≥eL+ln⁡4=4/η. Since exxn/n!≤2/n!, this choice gives a tail at most η/2≤η. In both cases n=O(1+L/ln⁡(e+L)). Since ln⁡(e+eL)≤L+ln⁡2≤e+L, this is also O(1+L/ln⁡ln⁡(e+eL)), the displayed order after changing logarithm bases. Hence K=n−1 has the stated order.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

45 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources