Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compute the twisted Burau determinant for a colored braid closure

Definition

Inputs. An integer n≥2; a finite Artin word β∈Bn in the positive-half-twist convention where σi sends the ith meridian xi to xixi+1xi−1 and xi+1 to xi; a surjective color map c from the cycles of the endpoint permutation to {1,…,μ}, written on strands as c1,…,cn and constant around each cycle; a field F with encoded exact arithmetic and equality; a positive integer d and invertible matrices ρ(xi)∈GLd(F); and compatible finite certificates of based deficiency-one 2-spines for the closure exterior X and the closure-with-axis exterior Y. The X spine has generators gi=x1⋯xi and relators ri=gi−1β∗(gi) for 1≤i<n. The Y spine has generators g1,…,gn,x and relators si=β∗(gi)(x−1gix)−1 for 1≤i≤n; x is the meridian of the axis. The certificates include a based cell structure on T with one vertex, 1-cells x,gn, and the commutator 2-cell; the one-vertex, one-core-edge structure on V=D2×S1; and compatible cell bases for X=Y∪TV. These spine and gluing certificates are geometric input and are not recognized by the procedure. Put H=⟨t1,…,tμ⟩≅Zμ, ψ(xi)=tci, gn=x1⋯xn, Λ=F[H], and Q=Frac⁡(Λ).

Instructions.

  1. Read the supplied X and Y spine/presentation correspondences and compatible gluing as certified geometric input; check their finite cell counts and relator lists, but do not attempt to recognize whether the data describe exterior spines. Return not-applicable if either certificate is absent. Compute the induced free-group automorphism β∗ by substituting the displayed Artin rules in the declared word order. For the mapping-torus checks, set the axis meridian's representation matrix to ρ(x)=Id. Return not-applicable if the coloring is not preserved on endpoints, if the representation fails any closure relator, or if it fails any mapping-torus relator si=β∗(gi)(x−1gix)−1. Equivalently the braid invariance checks ρ(β∗(xi))=ρ(xi) must hold for all meridians.

  2. Set ψ(x)=1 on the axis meridian. Verify the deck map on the relators ri and the axis relators si, and verify the colors are surjective, so ψ descends to both spine groups and is an epimorphism. Compute the positive-meridian full abelianization basis first, then use the explicit color map HL→H; no unannounced equal-variable or total-linking specialization is performed.

  3. Rewrite β∗(gi) in the free basis g1,…,gn, using xi=gi−1−1gi and g0=1. Compute the block Fox matrix Bβ with (i,j) block Φ(∂β∗(gi)/∂gj), using the product and inverse recursions of the Wada definition and Φ(g)=ρ(g)ψ(g). The braid fixes the boundary word gn, so its last block row is (0,…,0,Id). Let B‾ρ(β) be the upper-left (n−1)d-square block.

  4. Compute D=det⁡(ρ(gn)ψ(gn)−Id). If D=0, return not-applicable: this designated deleted column is inadmissible, even if another column of the Fox matrix could be used.

  5. Form the twisted cellular boundary matrices d1,d2 of the closure-exterior spine X from the Fox lemma. Use exact Gaussian elimination over Q to check the chain identity d1∘d2=0 (the row-matrix product JAstack=0). If this identity fails, return not-applicable because the encoded data do not define a chain complex. If it holds but the ranks are not rank⁡(d1)=d and rank⁡(d2)=(n−1)d, return 0 under the declared torsion convention. Otherwise compute N=det⁡(B‾ρ(β)−I(n−1)d) and return the rational function N/D as the twisted Burau determinant value, modulo the determinant/deck units of the based torsion convention.

The braid convention is shown for two adjacent downward-oriented strands. The left strand crosses over the right strand for σi; the gap records the underpass. The word, color map, and algebraic action above, rather than the diagram, determine the computation.

xixi+1xi+1xi

The displayed generator interchanges endpoint positions, with the original left strand passing over; the colors must follow the same permutation along each link component.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources