How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A general member of an abelian group need not come from an element
Statement refuted
Every member of an abelian group is equivalent to one arising from an ordinary element, that is, from a morphism .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The identity member .
Member classes correspond to subobjects (Members modulo equivalence correspond to subobjects).
The category is abelian (Abelian groups form an abelian category).
Counterexample
The image of the member is all of . By [L1], its equivalence class corresponds to the whole subgroup .
Any member coming from a map has cyclic image, because the image of is generated by the image of . The subgroup is not cyclic. Therefore is not equivalent to any member .
This refutes the statement.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders Mac Lane, Categories for the Working Mathematician, VIII.4 (standard reference, not scraped)