Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-29 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A general member of an abelian group need not come from an element

Statement refuted

Every member of an abelian group is equivalent to one arising from an ordinary element, that is, from a morphism ZA.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The identity member 1Z2:Z2Z2.

[L1]

Member classes correspond to subobjects (Members modulo equivalence correspond to subobjects).

[L2]

The category Ab is abelian (Abelian groups form an abelian category).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The image of the member 1Z2 is all of Z2. By [L1], its equivalence class corresponds to the whole subgroup Z2Z2.

L1L2
2.1

Any member coming from a map ZZ2 has cyclic image, because the image of Z is generated by the image of 1. The subgroup Z2 is not cyclic. Therefore 1Z2 is not equivalent to any member ZZ2.

L1step 1.1algebra
3.1

This refutes the statement.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources