Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A member chase verifying monicity

Example

Consider the inclusion i:2Z↪Z. If x:X→2Z is a member with ix≡0, then ix=0 on a common epic cover, so already x≡0. This is the member-calculus proof that i is monic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inclusion i:2Z↪Z.

[L1]

Monicity is detected by the implication ix≡0⇒x≡0 (Monicity is detected by members).

[L2]

Member cancellation is an equivalent reformulation (Monicity by member cancellation).

[L3]

The category Ab is abelian (Abelian groups form an abelian category).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L3algebra

If ix≡0, choose an epic cover u:W→X with ixu=0. Since i is the subgroup inclusion, xu=0. Hence x≡0.

2.1L1L2step 1.1∎

By [L1], this proves that i is monic; by [L2], it is the same computation as cancellation of equal members after applying i.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources