How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A minimising sequence need not converge strongly
Statement refuted
Counterexample. Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , let be its closed unit ball and let Then is nonnegative, convex and continuous, , and is a minimising sequence for with ; moreover and is the unique minimiser of on , but for every , so no subsequence of the minimising sequence converges strongly to the minimiser. The compactness recovered in the direct method is therefore genuinely weak compactness (The direct method in a reflexive Banach space).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; the real Hilbert space (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ), its coordinate vectors , namely the family that is at and elsewhere, its closed unit ball , and the functional . The counting-measure dictionary is the space of counting measure identifies with real , which is reflexive (and thus Banach) by Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity under Countable Choice, supplied here by AC; the series pairing is its inner product.
The series defining converges absolutely for every because and ; moreover , so is continuous, and is convex and nonnegative (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ).
Each coordinate vector satisfies , and : by the duality of and every bounded linear functional on is for a unique (Counting measure specializes the representation theorem to and ), so , and because a square-summable family has small tails, that is, for every there is a finite with (Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ), whence for every beyond all elements of ; weak convergence means convergence against every bounded linear functional (Weak convergence of nets and sequences).
In the direct method the compactness recovered is weak sequential compactness: a norm-bounded sequence in a reflexive Banach space has a weakly convergent subsequence (A bounded sequence in a reflexive Banach space has a weakly convergent subsequence), and the limit need not be a strong limit (The direct method in a reflexive Banach space, Proper, coercive and weakly lower semicontinuous extended-real functionals).
Counterexample
is nonnegative, convex and continuous. Nonnegativity and convexity are immediate from the formula. For continuity, expanding the squares gives , and by Cauchy-Schwarz, while ; hence as .
The minimising sequence. The point has , and , so . By [F2] the vectors lie in and satisfy , so is a minimising sequence for .
The unique minimiser. If has , then for every , hence for every and . So is the unique minimiser of on .
No strong convergence of the minimising sequence. By [F2] one has with for every , so does not tend to ; a fortiori no subsequence of converges in norm to , the unique minimiser of step 2.1.
Conclusion. The bounded minimising sequence converges weakly to by [F2], but no subsequence converges in norm to the unique minimiser by step 3.1. Thus the weak subsequence conclusion described in [F3], under that theorem's stated principles, cannot be upgraded to strong convergence of minimising sequences. No additional extraction is needed for this explicit witness.
Depends on
- The direct method in a reflexive Banach space
- Proper, coercive and weakly lower semicontinuous extended-real functionals
- Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space $\ell^2(I)$
- Counting measure specializes the representation theorem to $\ell^p$ and $\ell^q$
- Weak convergence of nets and sequences
- A bounded sequence in a reflexive Banach space has a weakly convergent subsequence
- The Axiom of Choice
- Reflexivity of Lp for one less p less infinity
- $\ell^p$ is the $L^p$ space of counting measure
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
52 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald Teschl, Partial Differential Equations: From Classical to Modern (2026 author manuscript; complete 392-page archived text) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Viktor Grigoryan, Math 246B Partial Differential Equations, UCSB 2011 (complete 31-page course notes) (standard reference, not scraped)