How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is the space of counting measure
Remark
On with counting measure, every function is measurable. Writing , one has
by the counting-measure integral dictionary, so is exactly the usual sequence class . Also
because a subset of has counting measure zero only when it is empty. Hence the quotient by almost-everywhere equality does nothing: for counting measure on , equality almost everywhere means equality everywhere.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite counting measure on n points recovers ℝⁿ p-norms Example
- k⁻ᵃ membership in ℓᵖ Example
- Finite counting measure recovers finite Holder and implies the signed Cauchy-Schwarz inequality Remark
- On a finite counting space, Minkowski agrees with the published finite theorem for p>1 Remark
- ℓᵖ includes into ℓʳ for p < r Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard L. Wheeden and Antoni Zygmund, Measure and Integral, Chapter 8 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sheldon Axler, Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, Example 2.55 and Chapter 7 (standard reference, not scraped)