How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The standard inner products make K n, ell two and quotient L two Hilbert spaces
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let be or and let be a measure space. Then the following are real or complex Hilbert spaces with the displayed first-variable-linear pairings, whose induced lengths are the standard norms:
- with , for each natural ;
- with ;
- the quotient with .
In the real case conjugation is the identity, so the pairings read and .
Facts & Assumptions
In a real or complex inner-product space the pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear and conjugate-symmetric in the second, positive definite, and the induced length is the square root of the diagonal pairing (Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length).
For complex scalars with exactly for , and (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive). The real field embeds in the complex field ( is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ); for an embedded real , conjugation fixes and the complex modulus is , the real absolute value (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus). Thus these same identities restrict to real scalars.
A normed space admitting a finite basis is a Banach space (Every finite-dimensional normed space is Banach), the induced length of an inner product is a norm (The induced length is a norm), and a Hilbert space is an inner-product space complete for its induced norm (Hilbert space).
On every scalar function is measurable, and the counting-measure dictionary gives ( is the space of counting measure). Applying the same nonnegative identity to the positive and negative parts of the real and imaginary parts of an integrable complex function gives its absolutely convergent series as its integral, by the defining real/complex integral formulas (Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals). Almost-everywhere equality is equality everywhere, since only the empty set has zero counting measure ( is the space of counting measure, Counting measure on an arbitrary set).
On the quotient the pairing is representative-independent and satisfies the inner-product axioms, with (The complex pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz).
Under countable choice, complex is complete and the complex pairing and its Cauchy–Schwarz inequality are available; the real spaces are complete for the same hypothesis (Complex completeness, density, and inner product: the consumer interface, Riesz-Fischer completeness of for , The space as the quotient by null functions).
Countable Choice is the hypothesis used by the cited completeness theorems; the complex pairing theorem [A5] itself is choice-free (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
Given: A scalar field , a natural and a measure space .
On the displayed pairing is linear in the first argument and conjugate symmetric by distributing each finite sum and applying the scalar conjugation identities of [A2], and positive definite because forces every and hence every by [A2]; the induced length is , a norm by [A3]. The coordinate vectors , , span by and are independent by reading each coordinate, hence form an ordered basis (the empty basis if ). The finite-basis completeness theorem [A3] therefore applies; so is a Hilbert space for this pairing.
On the pairing is the counting-measure integral of by [A4], so with absolutely convergent series, since and [A4] applies to the summable right-hand side; the complex case is [A5] and the real case is the restriction of [A5] to real-valued classes, where conjugation is the identity, so in both cases the axioms of [A1] hold and the induced length is the norm; completeness is the counting-measure instance of [A6].
On the quotient the displayed pairing is well defined on a.e. classes and satisfies the inner-product axioms with by [A5] in the complex case and by the same statement restricted to real-valued classes in the real case, and completeness is [A6].
Hence , and are inner-product spaces complete for the induced norms, that is Hilbert spaces, with the pairings displayed in the statement.
Depends on
- Hilbert space
- Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length
- Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, $z\overline z=|z|^2$, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
- Every finite-dimensional normed space is Banach
- $\ell^p$ is the $L^p$ space of counting measure
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Counting measure on an arbitrary set
- The complex $L^2$ pairing is well-defined and satisfies Cauchy–Schwarz
- Complex completeness, density, and inner product: the consumer interface
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
- Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus
- The induced length is a norm
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis, Example 1.42, p.39 and §2.3.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew Lin and Casey Rodriguez, MIT 18.102 Introduction to Functional Analysis, Lectures 15–16 and 22–23 (standard reference, not scraped)