Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A noncommutative handedness error in Tor

Statement refuted

Let R=M2(k) and let V=k2 be supplied only as the usual left column R-module. Two copies of the supplied left module RV do not by themselves provide an expression RVRRV or ToriR(RV,RV).

Counterexample

Given: the left matrix action of R on column vectors, with no right R-action included in the data.

1.1

A balanced tensor relation needs a right action on the first factor: (xr)y=x(ry).

given
2.1

The notation RV specifies only rv for the first copy; it supplies no value for vr. One could ask for additional right-module or bimodule data, but it is not part of the two given left modules.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Therefore the proposed tensor and Tor expressions have missing type data; this is a concrete handedness counterexample.

step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources