How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Weak and global dimension for a field and the integers
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a field , left and right weak global dimension and left and right global dimension are all ; for , all four are .
For a supplied finite basis of a -module, its projectivity, flatness and length-zero resolutions need no choice assumption; the AC hypothesis above concerns the conclusion for all modules.
Verification
Given: a field and AC for the all-module assertions; a finite basis when considering the separate finite-basis clause.
Under The Axiom of Choice, Every vector space has a basis supplies a basis for any -module , identifying it with the free module on that basis. By Free modules are projective, with the exact choice boundary, is projective: this second use of AC chooses preimages of basis values in each lifting problem. It is flat by Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring. Thus is both a length-zero projective and a length-zero flat resolution. For a supplied finite basis, the same free-projectivity theorem uses only finite choice, so these conclusions hold without AC.
Under AC, The integers have weak and global dimension one proves all four integer dimensions equal one, using actual length-one resolutions and the nonflat module . No independent undeclared Tor or Ext calculation is needed here.
The definitions Projective dimension of an object and The flat dimension of a module assign dimension zero to the modules in step 1.1. Their suprema, as in Left and right global dimension of a ring and Left and right weak global dimension, are therefore zero. Because is commutative, the right-module assertion is the same statement with the scalar action written on the other side. Together with step 1.2 this gives all the claimed values.
Depends on
- The integers have weak and global dimension one
- Every vector space has a basis
- Free modules are projective, with the exact choice boundary
- Projective left and right modules are flat over an arbitrary ring
- Left and right global dimension of a ring
- Left and right weak global dimension
- Projective dimension of an object
- The flat dimension of a module
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)