Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

8 results · all verified · 7 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Tor Flatness and Global Dimension — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This draft develops the stated conventions and boundary cases in manifest order.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Tor of two cyclic groups from a two-term resolution

Example

Compute Tor1Z(Z/12,Z/18)Z/6.

Verification

Given: the two-term resolution 0Z12ZZ/120.

1.1

Tensoring with Z/18 gives the degree-one kernel of multiplication by 12 on Z/18.

given
2.1

The congruence 12x0(mod18) has six solutions, namely the subgroup generated by 3.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

That subgroup is cyclic of order 6, so the Tor group is Z/6.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Tor detects n-torsion

Example

For M=Z/12 and n=8, Tor1Z(Z/8,M)Z/4.

Verification

Given: the multiplication-by-8 complex on Z/12.

1.1

Its kernel consists of residues x with 8x0(mod12).

given
2.1

These are 0,3,6,9, the subgroup generated by 3.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The subgroup has order 4, which exhibits exactly the 8-torsion detected by Tor.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A flat nonprojective module

Example

The Z-module Q is flat but not projective.

Verification

Given: the inclusion ZQ and the PID Z.

1.1

No nonzero integer annihilates a nonzero rational number, so Q is torsion-free.

given
2.1

Torsion-free modules over a PID are flat, hence Q is flat.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

A projective abelian group is free, but a nonzero free abelian group has a nonzero homomorphism to Z, whereas every homomorphism QZ is zero; therefore Q is not projective.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Localization is flat and has vanishing positive Tor

Example

For S={2k:k0}, the localization S1Z=Z[1/2] is flat and, for every abelian group N, ToriZ(N,Z[1/2])=0 for every i>0.

Verification

Given: a short exact sequence of abelian groups and the localization functor S1().

1.1

Localization is exact because an equality x/1=0 is witnessed by some 2kx=0, and the same witness lifts exactness through a short exact sequence.

given
2.1

The natural map NZZ[1/2]S1N, na/2kan/2k, is an isomorphism.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus Z[1/2] is exact, so the module is flat and its positive Tor groups vanish.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06Open item page →

The tensor double complex in low degrees

Example

Let m,n1 be integers. Label the resolutions Q and P, respectively, in the order 0ZmZZ/m0 and 0ZnZZ/n0. Their tensor double complex has K0,0=K1,0=K0,1=K1,1=Z and all other terms zero.

Verification

Given: the two displayed two-term resolutions.

1.1

In bidegrees (p,q) with p,q{0,1}, the tensor of the two free rank-one groups is Z.

given
2.1

The horizontal differential is multiplication by m. Under the supplied double-complex convention the vertical differential already includes the factor (1)p, so it is (1)p times multiplication by n. The total differential is therefore dh+dv, with no second sign inserted.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Hence Tot0=Z, Tot1=ZZ, and Tot2=Z, where the degree-one summands are ordered K1,0,K0,1. The total complex is 0Zc(nc,mc)Z2(a,b)ma+nbZ0. The composite is mnc+nmc=0, checking the sign and both axis labels. This also covers m=1 or n=1.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Tor symmetry over a commutative ring

Example

Over R=Z, Tor1Z(Z/4,Z/6)Tor1Z(Z/6,Z/4)Z/2.

Verification

Given: the cyclic Tor calculation and commutativity of Z.

1.1

The first group is Z/gcd(4,6)=Z/2.

given
2.1

Interchanging the two integers leaves their gcd unchanged and realizes the tensor-factor swap.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Thus this concrete calculation agrees with the natural symmetry over a commutative ring.

step 2.1algebra
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06Open item page →

A noncommutative handedness error in Tor

Statement refuted

Let R=M2(k) and let V=k2 be supplied only as the usual left column R-module. Two copies of the supplied left module RV do not by themselves provide an expression RVRRV or ToriR(RV,RV).

Counterexample

Given: the left matrix action of R on column vectors, with no right R-action included in the data.

1.1

A balanced tensor relation needs a right action on the first factor: (xr)y=x(ry).

given
2.1

The notation RV specifies only rv for the first copy; it supplies no value for vr. One could ask for additional right-module or bimodule data, but it is not part of the two given left modules.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Therefore the proposed tensor and Tor expressions have missing type data; this is a concrete handedness counterexample.

step 2.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)Open item page →
Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Weak and global dimension for a field and the integers

Example

For a field k, both dimensions are 0; for Z, both weak and global dimension are 1.

Verification

Given: the module categories over k and over Z.

1.1

Every vector space is free and hence projective, so every k-module has projective and flat dimension 0.

given
2.1

Every abelian group has a length-one free resolution, giving both dimensions of Z at most 1.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The nonzero group Tor1Z(Z/2,Z/2) gives the lower bound 1 for weak dimension, and nonzero Ext1 gives the global lower bound.

step 2.1algebra

Sources