How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Tor Flatness and Global Dimension — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Limits and Colimits
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Set Theory Beyond Choice: Recorded, Not Proved Here
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
2 · Summary
This draft develops the stated conventions and boundary cases in manifest order.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Tor of two cyclic groups from a two-term resolution
Example
Compute .
Verification
Given: the two-term resolution .
Tensoring with gives the degree-one kernel of multiplication by on .
The congruence has six solutions, namely the subgroup generated by .
That subgroup is cyclic of order , so the Tor group is .
Tor detects n-torsion
Example
For and , .
Verification
Given: the multiplication-by- complex on .
Its kernel consists of residues with .
These are , the subgroup generated by .
The subgroup has order , which exhibits exactly the -torsion detected by Tor.
A flat nonprojective module
Example
The -module is flat but not projective.
Verification
Given: the inclusion and the PID .
No nonzero integer annihilates a nonzero rational number, so is torsion-free.
Torsion-free modules over a PID are flat, hence is flat.
A projective abelian group is free, but a nonzero free abelian group has a nonzero homomorphism to , whereas every homomorphism is zero; therefore is not projective.
Localization is flat and has vanishing positive Tor
Example
For , the localization is flat and, for every abelian group , for every .
Verification
Given: a short exact sequence of abelian groups and the localization functor .
Localization is exact because an equality is witnessed by some , and the same witness lifts exactness through a short exact sequence.
The natural map , , is an isomorphism.
Thus is exact, so the module is flat and its positive Tor groups vanish.
The tensor double complex in low degrees
Example
Let be integers. Label the resolutions and , respectively, in the order and . Their tensor double complex has and all other terms zero.
Verification
Given: the two displayed two-term resolutions.
In bidegrees with , the tensor of the two free rank-one groups is .
The horizontal differential is multiplication by . Under the supplied double-complex convention the vertical differential already includes the factor , so it is times multiplication by . The total differential is therefore , with no second sign inserted.
Hence , , and , where the degree-one summands are ordered . The total complex is The composite is , checking the sign and both axis labels. This also covers or .
Tor symmetry over a commutative ring
Example
Over , .
Verification
Given: the cyclic Tor calculation and commutativity of .
The first group is .
Interchanging the two integers leaves their gcd unchanged and realizes the tensor-factor swap.
Thus this concrete calculation agrees with the natural symmetry over a commutative ring.
A noncommutative handedness error in Tor
Statement refuted
Let and let be supplied only as the usual left column -module. Two copies of the supplied left module do not by themselves provide an expression or .
Counterexample
Given: the left matrix action of on column vectors, with no right -action included in the data.
A balanced tensor relation needs a right action on the first factor: .
The notation specifies only for the first copy; it supplies no value for . One could ask for additional right-module or bimodule data, but it is not part of the two given left modules.
Therefore the proposed tensor and Tor expressions have missing type data; this is a concrete handedness counterexample.
Weak and global dimension for a field and the integers
Example
For a field , both dimensions are ; for , both weak and global dimension are .
Verification
Given: the module categories over and over .
Every vector space is free and hence projective, so every -module has projective and flat dimension .
Every abelian group has a length-one free resolution, giving both dimensions of at most .
The nonzero group gives the lower bound for weak dimension, and nonzero gives the global lower bound.