Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-09-09 (gpt-6-astra)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization is flat and has vanishing positive Tor

Example

For S={2k:k≥0}, the localization L=S−1Z=Z[1/2] is flat without any choice assumption. For every supplied projective resolution Q∙→N, one has Hi(Q∙⊗ZL)=0 for every i>0, also without choice.

Assuming AC, projective resolutions exist for all abelian groups and the usual balanced groups satisfy Tor⁡iZ(N,Z[1/2])=0 for every abelian group N and every i>0.

Verification

Given: S={2k:k≥0} and L=S−1Z; a supplied projective resolution where specified; AC only for the general balanced-Tor assertion.

1.1givenalgebra

In the fraction definition Multiplicative subsets and the localisation S−1R as equivalence classes of fractions, (a,2k) and (b,2l) are equivalent precisely when some 2j annihilates 2la−2kb. Since no nonzero integer is annihilated by 2j, this is equivalent to 2la=2kb. Therefore sending the class of (a,2k) to the rational a/2k is a well-defined injective homomorphism with image Z[1/2]. This proves the asserted identification and makes L torsion-free.

2.1step 1.1algebra

By Torsion-free abelian groups are flat, L is flat. Thus tensoring with L preserves short exact sequences, as in Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring. This proof of flatness uses no general localization-exactness or unproved fraction-tensor isomorphism.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

Let Q∙→N be a supplied projective resolution, and fix i>0. Write Zi=ker⁡di and Bi−1=im⁡di. Tensor the short exact sequence 0→Zi→Qi→Bi−1→0 with L. Tensoring the inclusion Bi−1→Qi−1 is also injective by flatness. Since di factors through these two maps, ker⁡(di⊗1) is the image of Zi⊗L in Qi⊗L. Exactness of the resolution gives a surjection Qi+1→Zi; tensoring preserves this surjection, so the same image is im⁡(di+1⊗1). Thus Hi(Q∙⊗L)=0 in every positive degree. This proves the specified-resolution clause of Tor from a projective resolution of the right module, without dimension shifting or choice.

4.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

Under The Axiom of Choice, Higher Tor over the integers vanishes supplies projective resolutions of N and L. To obtain DC locally, given an entire relation E on a nonempty set X and x0∈X, AC chooses s(x)∈{y:xEy} for every x∈X; The recursion theorem then gives xn+1=s(xn) from the prescribed x0. This proves the exact DC hypothesis of The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain. The interface The balanced Tor bifunctor therefore identifies the homology computed in step 3.1 with the usual balanced Tor. Its vanishing holds for all i>0, not just for i=1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources