How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Localization is flat and has vanishing positive Tor
Example
For , the localization is flat without any choice assumption. For every supplied projective resolution , one has for every , also without choice.
Assuming AC, projective resolutions exist for all abelian groups and the usual balanced groups satisfy for every abelian group and every .
Verification
Given: and ; a supplied projective resolution where specified; AC only for the general balanced-Tor assertion.
In the fraction definition Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions, and are equivalent precisely when some annihilates . Since no nonzero integer is annihilated by , this is equivalent to . Therefore sending the class of to the rational is a well-defined injective homomorphism with image . This proves the asserted identification and makes torsion-free.
By Torsion-free abelian groups are flat, is flat. Thus tensoring with preserves short exact sequences, as in Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring. This proof of flatness uses no general localization-exactness or unproved fraction-tensor isomorphism.
Let be a supplied projective resolution, and fix . Write and . Tensor the short exact sequence with . Tensoring the inclusion is also injective by flatness. Since factors through these two maps, is the image of in . Exactness of the resolution gives a surjection ; tensoring preserves this surjection, so the same image is . Thus in every positive degree. This proves the specified-resolution clause of Tor from a projective resolution of the right module, without dimension shifting or choice.
Under The Axiom of Choice, Higher Tor over the integers vanishes supplies projective resolutions of and . To obtain DC locally, given an entire relation on a nonempty set and , AC chooses for every ; The recursion theorem then gives from the prescribed . This proves the exact DC hypothesis of The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain. The interface The balanced Tor bifunctor therefore identifies the homology computed in step 3.1 with the usual balanced Tor. Its vanishing holds for all , not just for .
Depends on
- Multiplicative subsets and the localisation $S^{-1}R$ as equivalence classes of fractions
- Torsion-free abelian groups are flat
- Left and right flat modules over an arbitrary ring
- Tor from a projective resolution of the right module
- The balanced Tor bifunctor
- Higher Tor over the integers vanishes
- The Axiom of Choice
- The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an $\mathbb{N}$-indexed chain
- The recursion theorem
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)