Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A real invertible matrix with no real logarithm

Counterexample

Assume ACω. The matrix

A=(2001/2)

belongs to the connected Lie group GL2+(R)={B:detB>0}, but there is no real 2×2 matrix X with eX=A. Hence a Lie-group exponential need not be surjective even when the group is connected.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed real matrix A.

[F1]

GL2(R) is a matrix Lie group with tangent algebra M2(R). General and special linear Lie groups.

[F2]

Its Lie exponential is the ordinary matrix exponential. Matrix exponential as the Lie-group exponential.

[F4]

Countable choice is inherited through [F1] and [F2]. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

Refutation

technique · counterexample
1.1

Direct calculation using [F3] gives detA=1, so AGL2+(R).

F3algebra
1.2

By [F1], the positive-determinant open subgroup is a Lie group; it is path connected. Indeed, for any B=(b1 b2) in it, put u=b1/b1, let v be the positive quarter-turn of u, and set Q=(u v)SO(2). Then QTB=R=(rs0t) with r=b1>0 and t=det(B)/r>0. The path Rλ=((1λ)r+λ(1λ)s0(1λ)t+λ) joins R to I through positive-determinant matrices, while writing the fixed Q as a rotation through some angle θ gives the path of rotations from Q to I. Concatenating B=QR first to Q and then to I proves path connectedness.

F1F3constructalgebra
1.3

Assume for contradiction that a real matrix X satisfies eX=A. The defining power series commutes with X, so XA=AX. Since A has the two distinct eigenspaces Re1 and Re2, commutation makes each of them X-invariant. Hence Xe1=xe1 for some real x, and the power series gives eXe1=exe1 with ex>0, whereas Ae1=2e1. This is impossible.

assume-contraF2algebra
2.1

Thus A has no real matrix logarithm. By [F2], it is not in the image of the Lie exponential of the connected group established in step 1.2, disproving surjectivity. The witness is nonsingular and two-dimensional; no claim is made in dimensions zero or one. There is no boundary, metric, interval endpoint, or iff issue. The logarithm obstruction and path construction are choice-free; ACω is present only because the current Lie-exponential interface [F2] carries it.

discharge-contradictionF2F4step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources