How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Calderón–Zygmund operators need not map L∞ to L∞
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The bounded function has compatible Hilbert transform , which is essentially unbounded near and near : as and as . Therefore no bounded extension agrees with the Hilbert transform on , and need not be mapped to by a Calderón–Zygmund operator. No BMO-valued endpoint estimate is refuted or asserted here.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The indicator , its transform on , and the truncations of Truncated Hilbert transform and principal value.
, the symmetric principal value satisfies for every , and almost everywhere as an class (Strong type (1,1) fails for the Hilbert transform, Truncated Hilbert transform and principal value).
Counterexample
The function is unbounded above and below on every punctured neighbourhood of the endpoints: for , , which tends to as and to as ; since is continuous, strictly increasing, with and , one has as and as . Hence for every the sets and contain nondegenerate intervals, so both have positive Lebesgue measure and is not essentially bounded.
Suppose were bounded and agreed with the Hilbert transform on . Since by [F1], the class would equal the class ; but is not essentially bounded by step 1.1, whereas every class in is essentially bounded. This contradiction shows that no bounded extension compatible on exists, which is the asserted failure; nothing here concerns a BMO-valued estimate.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard S. Laugesen, Harmonic Analysis Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)