How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A closed orbit need not be stable: the trivial multiplicative-group action on a point
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the named suppliers. The assertion 'every point of a complex affine -variety whose orbit is closed is stable' is false. Counterexample: acts trivially on the one-point affine algebraic set ; the unique orbit is closed, but the stabilizer is positive-dimensional, so the point is not stable (Stable points of an affine action, Reductive and linearly reductive complex algebraic groups).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the multiplicative group acting trivially on the one-point affine algebraic set , so that for every .
Stable points. A point of an affine algebraic set with an algebraic -action is stable if its orbit is closed in and its stabilizer is finite (Stable points of an affine action); by the same definition, is finite exactly when , so a positive-dimensional stabilizer is infinite.
The trivial action is algebraic. An algebraic left action on an affine algebraic set is a morphism satisfying the identity and associativity laws; the constant map is a morphism and satisfies both (Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules).
Verification
The trivial action of on is algebraic by [F2]; its unique orbit is , which is closed in because every subset of the one-point space is closed, and the stabilizer of is .
The group is infinite, since it contains for every nonzero complex number ; hence the stabilizer is not finite and the point is not stable by [F1], although its orbit is closed. This refutes the displayed assertion.
Remarks
- This is Brion's Example 1.27(1) in its simplest form: the closedness of an orbit does not suffice for stability, and the finite-stabilizer hypothesis of the stable-locus theorem cannot be dropped.
- The counterexample is the one prescribed by the AG-ACT-3 design; the
companion B-page example
ex-gm-quotient-of-affine-planerecords the same phenomenon inside a positive-dimensional computation.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22 (standard reference, not scraped)