How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules
Definition
A complex affine algebraic group is a nonempty affine algebraic set equipped with a group law whose multiplication and inversion are morphisms. Write for its identity. Neither nor any affine algebraic set below is required to be irreducible. Its coordinate algebra has maps , , and , using Products of affine algebraic sets have tensor-product coordinate rings to identify product rings.
The group identities give and : evaluate on and , respectively. Likewise multiplying the two factors of or evaluates to , so both are . These are identities of coordinate functions by the product-ring lemma and polynomial-function identification, and follows from inversion squared.
An algebraic (or rational) left action on an affine algebraic set is a morphism satisfying and . Here morphisms and coordinate rings are those of A morphism from an open subset of a classical affine variety to an affine variety and The coordinate ring of a classical affine algebraic set. An equivariant morphism satisfies .
A rational -module is a complex vector space with a linear left action of such that every vector belongs to a finite-dimensional stable subspace on which is a morphism. The zero subspace is permitted. For a finite-dimensional , regular matrix coefficients and the group law express this condition; has coordinate ring .
The left action on functions is always . Its right-comodule convention is with and . Evaluation of the second factor at gives . The direct action pullback instead lands in and evaluates to ; these two conventions must be distinguished.
Depends on
Used by
- An abstract group action need not be an algebraic action Counterexample
- Opposite weights on the affine plane and its coordinate ring Example
- The additive translation action embeds equivariantly as a parabola Example
- Every affine-group comodule is a union of finite-dimensional rational submodules Lemma
- Torus rational modules and affine actions are lattice gradings Lemma
- Affine actions correspond to coordinate-ring coactions Proposition
- Every complex affine algebraic action has a finite-dimensional equivariant closed embedding Theorem
- The coordinate ring of an affine algebraic action is a locally finite rational module Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups (2010) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Philippe Gille, Introduction to reductive group schemes over rings, full notes retrieved 2026-10-02 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)