How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The coordinate ring of an affine algebraic action is a locally finite rational module
Statement
Assume AC for the local affine coaction dictionary. If a complex affine algebraic group acts algebraically on an affine algebraic set , then with is a rational -module: every finite set of functions is contained in a finite-dimensional stable subspace on which acts algebraically. The action preserves multiplication and the unit. No irreducibility or reductivity is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraic left action on and AC (The Axiom of Choice).
The inverse-action pullback is a right-comodule algebra map (Affine actions correspond to coordinate-ring coactions).
Finite subsets of a comodule lie in finite-dimensional rational submodules (Every affine-group comodule is a union of finite-dimensional rational submodules).
Proof
F1 makes a right comodule whose evaluated representation is exactly . Apply F2 to any finite subset of to obtain the required finite-dimensional stable subspace with algebraic -action. By the definition in Classical complex affine algebraic actions and rational modules, this is rationality and local finiteness.
Since is an algebra map, evaluating its second factor at any gives and . Thus each acts by an algebra automorphism, with inverse . The hypotheses of F1 and F2 cover reducible and empty and disconnected , so none of the excluded extra hypotheses is needed. AC is inherited solely from F1's affine reconstruction route.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups (2010) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Philippe Gille, Introduction to reductive group schemes over rings, full notes retrieved 2026-10-02 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)