Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous functional calculus cannot produce every spectral projection

Statement refuted

Assume AC. For T=Mx, multiplication by the coordinate on L2([0,1],λ), there is a continuous f:[0,1]C with f(T)=E([0,12]), where E is the spectral projection valued measure of T.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

T=Mx is bounded self-adjoint with σ(T)=[0,1]; its spectral projections act by E(B)=M1B, and E([0,1/2]) is the orthogonal projection onto the classes supported in [0,1/2] (Pvm of a multiplication operator, Borel functional calculus defines a discontinuous characteristic function).

[A2]

The continuous calculus is the restriction of the Borel calculus to continuous functions: for continuous f the operator f(T) of Continuous functional calculus for bounded normal operators satisfies f(T)=Mfx (Pvm of a multiplication operator, Borel functional calculus for a bounded normal operator).

[A3]

Multiplication operators in L2: Mgh=0 as a class exactly when gh=0 almost everywhere, and two continuous functions on [0,1] that agree almost everywhere agree everywhere, because the complement of the closed set on which they agree is open and null (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Spectrum and resolvent of a bounded operator).

[A4]

AC is the declared choice hypothesis of this page from the construction item onward (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

technique · direct

Given: Lebesgue measure on [0,1], the operator T=Mx and the spectral projection P:=E([0,1/2])=M1[0,1/2].

1.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that fC([0,1]) satisfies Mfx=f(T)=P=M1[0,1/2].

A1A2
2.1

Evaluating on h:=1[0,1/2], one gets (fx)h=1[0,1/2]h=h; subtracting, (f1)h=0 almost everywhere, so (fx1)=0 almost everywhere on the set {h0}=[0,1/2] (modulo a null set), hence f=1 on [0,1/2] by continuity.

step 1.1A3
2.2

Evaluating on the nonzeroth class h:=1(1/2,1], one gets (fx)h=1[0,1/2]h=0, so f=0 almost everywhere on (1/2,1] and hence f=0 on (1/2,1] by continuity, which forces f(1/2)=0.

step 1.1A3
3.1

The two evaluations give f(1/2)=1 and f(1/2)=0 simultaneously, a contradiction.

step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

No continuous function on [0,1] can satisfy f(T)=E([0,1/2]) for T=Mx: this particular spectral projection forces incompatible one-sided values at 1/2 and is not a continuous-calculus value of T.

step 3.1A4

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources