How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuous functional calculus cannot produce every spectral projection
Statement refuted
Assume AC. For , multiplication by the coordinate on , there is a continuous with , where is the spectral projection valued measure of .
Facts & Assumptions
is bounded self-adjoint with ; its spectral projections act by , and is the orthogonal projection onto the classes supported in (Pvm of a multiplication operator, Borel functional calculus defines a discontinuous characteristic function).
The continuous calculus is the restriction of the Borel calculus to continuous functions: for continuous the operator of Continuous functional calculus for bounded normal operators satisfies (Pvm of a multiplication operator, Borel functional calculus for a bounded normal operator).
Multiplication operators in : as a class exactly when almost everywhere, and two continuous functions on that agree almost everywhere agree everywhere, because the complement of the closed set on which they agree is open and null (The space as the quotient by null functions, Spectrum and resolvent of a bounded operator).
AC is the declared choice hypothesis of this page from the construction item onward (The Axiom of Choice).
Counterexample
Given: Lebesgue measure on , the operator and the spectral projection .
Suppose, for contradiction, that satisfies .
Evaluating on , one gets ; subtracting, almost everywhere, so almost everywhere on the set (modulo a null set), hence on by continuity.
Evaluating on the nonzeroth class , one gets , so almost everywhere on and hence on by continuity, which forces .
The two evaluations give and simultaneously, a contradiction.
No continuous function on can satisfy for : this particular spectral projection forces incompatible one-sided values at and is not a continuous-calculus value of .
Depends on
- Borel functional calculus for bounded normal operators
- Pvm of a multiplication operator
- Borel functional calculus defines a discontinuous characteristic function
- Continuous functional calculus for bounded normal operators
- Borel functional calculus for a bounded normal operator
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Spectrum and resolvent of a bounded operator
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Theo Bühler and Dietmar Salamon, Functional Analysis, §5.7, printed pp.290–296 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dana P. Williams, Lecture Notes on the Spectral Theorem, §4 and §5, pp.13–20 (standard reference, not scraped)