Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Pvm of a multiplication operator

Example

Assume AC. Let (X,Σ,μ) be a sigma-finite measure space with μ(X)>0 (Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures), let m:X→C be bounded and measurable (A measurable function between measurable spaces), and let Mm:L2(μ;C)→L2(μ;C) be multiplication by m, Mmf=m⋅f (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions). Then Mm is a bounded normal operator, its spectrum is the essential range R(m):={z∈C: μ(m−1(B(z,ε)))>0 for every ε>0}, its spectral projection valued measure E on the Borel σ-algebra of R(m) is E(B)f=1m−1(B)f, and its bounded Borel functional calculus is f(Mm)=Mf~∘m,f(Mm)h=(f~∘m)⋅h, for every bounded Borel f on R(m), where f~ is the zero extension of f to C. Since m∈R(m) almost everywhere, the resulting multiplication operator is independent of the values chosen for an extension off R(m) and is customarily denoted Mf∘m.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

L2(μ) is a Hilbert space; its elements are almost-everywhere classes, ∥f∥22=∫∣f∣2 dμ, and ⟨f,g⟩=∫fg‾ dμ (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, Hilbert space).

[A2]

For a bounded complex measurable φ, use the real essential-supremum interface on ∣φ∣ to define ∥φ∥∞. This essential supremum ∥φ∥∞ is the least essential bound: ∣φ∣≤∥φ∥∞ almost everywhere (The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure, The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound).

[A3]

z∈ρ(T) exactly when zI−T is bijective with bounded inverse; a bounded operator that is not bounded below has no bounded inverse (Spectrum and resolvent of a bounded operator, The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[A4]

Sigma-finiteness provides finite-measure sets covering X; finite unions make the cover increasing. If every intersection of a positive-measure set with these cover sets were null, their countable union would be null. Hence one intersection has positive finite measure (Finite, sigma-finite, and semifinite measures).

[A5]

A finite Borel measure on a second-countable LCH space is regular (Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular).

[A6]

For a bounded normal operator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, its spectrum is nonempty compact and the spectral PVM is the unique regular PVM on σ(T) with ∫z dE=T, and f(T) has pairings ⟨f(T)h,g⟩=∫f dEh,g with Eh,g(B)=⟨E(B)h,g⟩ (Spectral theorem for bounded normal operators pvm form, Borel functional calculus for bounded normal operators, Borel functional calculus for a bounded normal operator, Scalar and complex measures from a pvm, Bounded borel pvm integral).

[A7]

Domination: if ∣m∣≤∥φ∥∞ almost everywhere and h∈L2(μ) then ∫∣m∣2∣h∣2 dμ≤∥φ∥∞2∥h∥2; and dominated convergence applies to uniformly bounded pointwise convergent sequences against the finite measure ∣h∣2dμ (Dominated convergence).

[A8]

The adjoint pairing is that of The Hilbert-space adjoint of a bounded operator, and regular PVM means Projection valued measure. AC is the declared choice hypothesis of this page from the construction item onward (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: A sigma-finite measure space (X,Σ,μ), a bounded measurable m, and the multiplication operator Mmf=mf on L2(μ); write R:=R(m) for the essential range.

1.1A1A2A4A7

Mm is a bounded linear operator with ∥Mm∥=∥m∥∞: ∥Mmh∥22=∫∣m∣2∣h∣2 dμ≤∥m∥∞2∥h∥22, and if 0≤c<∥m∥∞, the set A={∣m∣>c} has positive measure, and choosing B⊆A of positive finite measure gives ∥Mm1B∥2≥c∥1B∥2, so ∥Mm∥≥c and hence ∥Mm∥=∥m∥∞ (when the essential norm is zero, the upper bound already gives equality). Since μ(X)>0, [A4] also supplies a nonzero finite-measure indicator, so this Hilbert space is nonzero.

1.2A1A7A8

Mm is normal: the adjoint is Mm‾ because ⟨Mmh,g⟩=∫mhg‾ dμ=∫hm‾g‾ dμ=⟨h,Mm‾g⟩, and MmMm‾=M∣m∣2=Mm‾Mm.

2.1step 1.1A3A4

σ(Mm)=R: if z∉R then μ(m−1(B(z,ε)))=0 for some ε>0, so ∣m−z∣≥ε almost everywhere, r(x):=1/(m(x)−z) on {∣m−z∣≥ε} and r(x):=0 elsewhere defines a bounded measurable multiplier Mr that is a two-sided inverse on a.e. classes of Mm−zI, and z∈ρ(Mm); if z∈R then for each n the set An={∣m−z∣<1/(n+1)} has positive measure, sigma-finiteness gives Bn⊆An with 0<μ(Bn)<∞, and the unit vectors hn=1Bn/∥1Bn∥2 satisfy ∥(Mm−zI)hn∥2≤1n+1, so Mm−zI is not bounded below and z∈σ(Mm).

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1A6

The set R=σ(Mm) is nonempty compact by [A6] and steps 1.1–2.1. It is a second-countable LCH space, being a compact subspace of the Euclidean plane (intersections with rational-centre, rational-radius balls give a countable base). Moreover m∈R almost everywhere: for every z∉R there is an open ball about z with null preimage; a countable rational-ball base refines all these balls. The union of those base balls having null preimage is exactly C∖R, since any point in one has a smaller ball with null preimage. Its preimage is a countable union of null sets.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 3.1A1A5A7A8

Define E(B)=M1m−1(B) for Borel B⊆R; these sets are also Borel in C since R is closed. Each E(B) is an orthogonal projection by multiplication and the adjoint pairing; E(∅)=0, E(R)=I by step 3.1, and E(B∩C)=E(B)E(C). For disjoint (Bn)n≥0 with union B, the squared norm of the additive remainder is the integral of ∣1m−1(B)−∑n≤N1m−1(Bn)∣2∣h∣2. The integrands tend to zero and are bounded by the integrable function ∣h∣2, so dominated convergence gives strong countable additivity. Thus E is a PVM. Its positive scalar measures Eh(B)=∫m−1(B)∣h∣2 dμ have mass ∥h∥2 and are finite Borel measures on the second-countable LCH space R, hence regular by [A5].

5.1step 3.1step 4.1A1A6A7

For every h,g∈L2(μ) the product hg‾ is integrable, since 2∣hg‾∣≤∣h∣2+∣g∣2. The scalar measure Eh,g(B)=∫m−1(B)hg‾ dμ therefore satisfies ∫φ dEh,g=∫(φ~∘m)hg‾ dμ first for indicators and simple functions, using zero extensions. For bounded Borel f on R, uniformly approximating by simple functions proves the same equality: the right-side error is bounded by the uniform error times ∫∣hg∣, and the left-side error by the uniform error times ∣Eh,g∣(R)<∞. No boundedness restriction on h,g or density assertion is needed. In particular for f(z)=z, step 3.1 makes f~∘m=m almost everywhere, so the bounded PVM integral satisfies ΦE(z)=Mm by equality of all pairings.

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1A6

By the uniqueness clause of the spectral theorem the regular PVM E on R=σ(Mm) with ∫z dE=Mm is the spectral PVM of Mm; for every bounded Borel f on R, let f~ be its zero extension to C. The same approximation argument gives ⟨f(Mm)h,g⟩=∫f dEh,g=∫(f~∘m)hg‾ dμ=⟨Mf~∘mh,g⟩, hence f(Mm)=Mf~∘m for all h,g; because m∈R almost everywhere, this class is independent of the extension off R.

7.1step 2.1step 4.1step 6.1A8∎

The multiplication operator has spectrum the essential range of m, spectral projections given by multiplication by the pulled-back indicators, and Borel calculus f(Mm)=Mf~∘m, customarily written Mf∘m modulo the null set where m∉R(m).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

90 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources