Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spectral projection of an isolated eigenvalue agrees with the riesz projection

Example

Assume AC. Let T be a bounded normal operator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space H, let λ be an isolated point of σ(T), and let r>0 be such that the closed disc D(λ,r)‾ meets σ(T) in {λ} alone; let γ(t)=λ+rexp⁡(it), 0≤t≤2π, be the positively oriented circle. Then the spectral projection of the singleton equals the Riesz spectral projection, E({λ})=12πi∮γ(zI−T)−1 dz, where the contour integral is the Banach-algebra-valued integral of Riesz spectral projection (with resolvent (zI−T)−1, matching its convention R(z,a)=(z1−a)−1, and not the opposite sign (T−zI)−1), and where E is the spectral PVM of Spectral projections and resolution of the identity.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

{λ} is clopen in σ(T), so the Riesz spectral projection P{λ}=12πi∫Γχ{λ}(z)(zI−T)−1dz is defined and lies in B(H); it is an idempotent commuting with T (Riesz spectral projection, Riesz spectral projection properties).

[A2]

For z∉σ(T) the function gz(ζ):=(z−ζ)−1 is bounded Borel on σ(T) and (zI−T)−1=ΦE(gz): zI−T=ΦE(z−ζ) and multiplying by z−ζ, using multiplicativity of the Borel calculus, gives (zI−T)ΦE(gz)=ΦE((z−ζ)gz)=ΦE(1)=I and ΦE(gz)(zI−T)=I (Borel functional calculus for bounded normal operators, Borel functional calculus for a bounded normal operator).

[A3]

A bounded linear map between Banach spaces commutes with Bochner integration (Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration). Integrable simple approximations converging in integral norm define the Bochner integral (Bochner-integrable function); continuity and the required approximations for this contour are proved below, not inferred from the resolvent definition.

[A4]

Scalar Cauchy facts: if f is holomorphic on the disc D(a,R) and γ is the positively oriented circle ∣ζ−a∣=r with 0<r<R, then f(z)=12πi∫γf(ζ)ζ−zdζ for ∣z−a∣<r; and for a holomorphic f on a convex domain and a closed rectifiable contour in it, ∫γf=0 (Cauchy's integral formula on a circle compactly contained in a disc of holomorphy, Cauchy's theorem on a convex complex domain).

[A5]

For every bounded Borel h one has ΦE(1B)=E(B) and ΦE is linear and bounded, with ∥ΦE(h)∥≤∥h∥∞ (Bounded borel pvm integral, Borel functional calculus for a bounded normal operator, Hilbert space).

[A7]

The spectrum K=σ(T) is nonempty compact (Spectral theorem for bounded normal operators pvm form). A Banach space is complete in its norm, uniform limits of continuous scalar functions are continuous, and B(H) is Banach (Banach space, A uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous, so C(X,Y) is closed in YX under the uniform metric, If Y is Banach then B(X,Y) is Banach, Hilbert space).

[A6]

AC is the declared choice hypothesis of this page from the construction item onward (The Axiom of Choice).

[A8]

The continuous calculus is isometric, the Borel calculus agrees with it on continuous functions, and E({λ})H=ker⁡(T−λI) (Continuous functional calculus for bounded normal operators, Borel functional calculus for bounded normal operators, Spectral projections and resolution of the identity).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: A bounded normal T, an isolated spectral point λ, a radius r>0 with D(λ,r)‾∩σ(T)={λ}, the circle γ, and K=σ(T).

1.1A2A3A5A7

First Cb(K) is Banach in the supremum norm. If (fm) is Cauchy, then (fm(ζ)) converges for every ζ; call the limit f(ζ). Fixing one sufficiently late index bounds f uniformly, and letting the other index tend pointwise to its limit in the Cauchy estimate gives ∥fm−f∥∞→0. Thus f is continuous by [A7], proving completeness. Now let δ=dist⁡(γ,K)>0, positive since the two compact sets are disjoint. For z,w on the circle, gz∈Cb(K), ∥gz∥∞≤δ−1 and ∥gz−gw∥∞≤∣z−w∣δ−2, by subtracting the reciprocals pointwise. Thus t↦gγ(t)γ′(t) is continuous, indeed uniformly continuous, into Cb(K) on [0,2π]. Step functions on successively finer equal subdivisions, with endpoint values as coefficients, approximate it uniformly, hence also in integral norm (error at most 2π times the uniform error); they show strong measurability and Bochner integrability by definition. Applying the bounded map ΦE:Cb(K)→B(H) also proves continuity and Bochner integrability of the resolvent contour integrand, since ΦE(gz)=(zI−T)−1.

1.2A4

The scalar Cauchy kernel of the contour is the indicator of the enclosed disc: for every ζ∈C∖γ([0,2π]) one has c(ζ):=12πi∮γ(z−ζ)−1dz=1 if ∣ζ−λ∣<r and c(ζ)=0 if ∣ζ−λ∣>r, by the Cauchy integral formula applied to f≡1 in the first case and Cauchy's theorem on the convex disc D(λ,∣ζ−λ∣) in the second.

2.1step 1.1A3A5A7

By step 1.1 and Bochner commutation, 12πi∮γ(zI−T)−1 dz=ΦE(12πi∫02πgγ(t)γ′(t) dt). For every ζ∈K, evaluation u↦u(ζ) is bounded linear on Cb(K) with norm at most one; applying Bochner commutation once more identifies the function inside ΦE pointwise with c∣K. All contour integrals here include the derivative of the parametrization.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1A5

Evaluation on the spectrum: the closed disc D(λ,r)‾ meets σ(T) only at λ, so for ζ∈σ(T) the value c(ζ) is 1 exactly at ζ=λ and 0 otherwise; hence c∣σ(T)=1{λ} and the contour integral equals ΦE(1{λ})=E({λ}).

4.1step 1.2step 3.1A1A6A7

To check the defining Riesz cycle conditions, choose R>r with K∖{λ} disjoint from D(λ,R)‾: compactness gives such an R if this complement is nonempty, and any R>r works otherwise. Choose r<R1<R2<R, set U1=D(λ,R1) and U0={z:∣z−λ∣>R2}, and define χ=1 on U1, χ=0 on U0. These are disjoint open neighborhoods of the respective spectral parts. The circle lies in U1∖K, has index one at λ, zero at the other spectral points and zero outside U1∪U0, by step 1.2. Thus it is a permitted cycle in the Riesz definition and χ=1 on it. Consequently P{λ}=12πi∮γ(zI−T)−1 dz=E({λ}).

4.2step 3.1A5A8

The isolated spectral point is an eigenvalue. Indeed 1{λ} is a nonzero continuous function on K because the singleton is clopen there, so isometry of the continuous calculus gives ∥1{λ}(T)∥=1. Agreement of the calculi and step 3.1 identify this operator with E({λ}), which is therefore nonzero; since its range equals ker⁡(T−λI), that eigenspace is nonzero.

5.1step 4.1step 4.2A1∎

The spectral projection of the isolated eigenvalue λ is therefore exactly the Riesz projection computed from the resolvent (zI−T)−1 along a positively oriented circle separating λ from the rest of the spectrum.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources