Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Continuous functional calculus for bounded normal operators

Statement

Assume AC. For a bounded normal operator T on a nonzero complex Hilbert space there is a unique isometric unital star-isomorphism C(σ(T))C(I,T), ff(T), sending the coordinate function z to T; for self-adjoint T it agrees with the self-adjoint calculus.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

For normal T the nonzero unital commutative C*-algebra C(I,T) has a nonempty compact Hausdorff character space, and the map Φ:Δ(C(I,T))σ(T), χχ(T), is a homeomorphism onto the therefore nonempty compact spectrum; pullback ffΦ is consequently an isometric bijection C(σ(T))C(Δ(C(I,T))) preserving pointwise sums, products and conjugation (Maximal ideal space is compact Hausdorff, Character space of generated normal algebra is operator spectrum, C star algebra).

[A2]

For a nonzero unital commutative complex C*-algebra C the Gelfand transform Γ:CC(Δ(C)) is an isometric unital -isomorphism onto C(Δ(C)), so its inverse has the same properties (Commutative Gelfand Naimark).

[A3]

For normal T the generated algebra C(I,T) is a nonzero unital commutative C*-algebra with the same identity as B(H) (C star algebra generated by a normal operator).

[A4]

Every unital point-separating self-adjoint complex function algebra on a nonempty compact Hausdorff space is uniformly dense in the continuous functions; applied to σ(T)C this makes the -polynomials in z and z uniformly dense in C(σ(T)) (Complex Stone–Weierstrass dichotomy for separating self-adjoint algebras; the unital case is dense).

[A5]

For self-adjoint T there is a unique isometric unital star-homomorphism C(σ(T))B(H) with zT and range C(I,T) (Continuous functional calculus for bounded self adjoint operators).

[A6]

Every self-adjoint operator is normal (Self-adjoint, positive, unitary and normal operators).

[A7]

AC is the hypothesis of the Gelfand and character-space suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: A nonzero complex Hilbert space H and a bounded normal operator TB(H), with Δ:=Δ(C(I,T)) and Φ(χ)=χ(T).

1.1

The algebra C(I,T) is a nonzero unital commutative C*-algebra with the same identity as B(H), its character space Δ is nonempty compact Hausdorff, Φ:Δσ(T) is a homeomorphism, and the pullback map U(f):=fΦ is an isometric bijection C(σ(T))C(Δ) that preserves pointwise sums, products and conjugation.

A1A3
1.2

The inverse Gelfand transform Γ1:C(Δ)C(I,T) is an isometric unital -isomorphism onto C(I,T).

A2
2.1

The composite Ψ:=Γ1U:C(σ(T))C(I,T) is an isometric unital -isomorphism onto C(I,T), and Ψ(z)=Γ1(T^)=T because the Gelfand transform of T is T^(χ)=χ(T)=Φ(χ)=z(Φ(χ))=(zΦ)(χ).

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
3.1

Ψ is the only isometric unital -isomorphism C(σ(T))C(I,T) with zT: if Ξ is another, then Ξ1Ψ is a unital -isomorphism of C(σ(T)) fixing z and z, hence fixing every -polynomial in z; these are uniformly dense by Stone–Weierstrass and the map is isometric, so it is the identity on C(σ(T)) and Ξ=Ψ.

step 2.1A4A7algebra
4.1

For self-adjoint T the self-adjoint calculus of [A5] is an isometric unital star-homomorphism C(σ(T))B(H) with zT and range C(I,T); regarded as a map onto C(I,T) it is an isometric unital -isomorphism, so step 3.1 identifies it with Ψ.

step 2.1step 3.1A5A6
5.1

The map ff(T):=Ψ(f) is therefore the unique isometric unital star-isomorphism C(σ(T))C(I,T) sending z to T, and it agrees with the self-adjoint calculus when T is self-adjoint.

step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources