Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complex Stone–Weierstrass dichotomy for separating self-adjoint algebras; the unital case is dense

Statement

Let X be a compact Hausdorff space and let A⊆C(X,C) be a point-separating self-adjoint complex function algebra, not necessarily unital. Exactly one of the following descriptions applies when X is nonempty:

  1. A has no common zero, and its uniform closure is C(X,C);
  2. there is a unique x0∈X at which every member of A vanishes, and the uniform closure of A is exactly Ix0C:={f∈C(X,C):f(x0)=0}.

If X=∅, the first conclusion holds. In particular, every unital point-separating self-adjoint complex function algebra is uniformly dense in C(X,C).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact Hausdorff space X and a point-separating self-adjoint complex function algebra A⊆C(X,C).

[L1]

The real-valued part AR of A is a point-separating real function algebra with exactly the same common-zero set as A, and it is unital when A is unital (The real-valued part of a point-separating self-adjoint complex function algebra is separating and has the same common zeros).

[L2]

A point-separating real function algebra has either full uniform closure or a unique common zero x0 and closure equal to the real functions vanishing at x0; the empty space has full closure (A separating real function algebra is dense or its closure consists exactly of the functions vanishing at one point).

[L3]

The complex numbers form a field containing R, and every complex number has a unique form a+bi (C=R[x]/(x2+1) is a field, every element is uniquely a+bi, and every nonzero element has inverse (a−bi)/(a2+b2)).

[L4]

For every z,w∈C, ∣z+w∣≤∣z∣+∣w∣ and ∣zw∣=∣z∣∣w∣ (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, zz‾=∣z∣2, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).

[L5]

The metric on C is dC(z,w)=∣z−w∣, and continuity on subsets of C uses this metric (The Euclidean metric, convergence, Cauchy sequences, and continuity on the complex plane).

[L6]

For z=a+bi, Re⁡z=a, Im⁡z=b, and ∣z∣=a2+b2 (Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2

If X=∅, then C(X,C) has only the empty function, which is the zero element of A, so the full-closure conclusion holds.

1.2L1L2

Assume X≠∅. By [L1] and [L2], the real-valued part AR either is dense in C(X,R) or has a unique common zero x0 and closure equal to the real functions vanishing there.

2.1step 1.2L1L3L5L6choose

In the dense alternative, let F∈C(X,C) and ε>0; the coordinate functions Re⁡F and Im⁡F are continuous by [L5] and [L6], so choose u,v∈AR within ε/2 of them and put h:=u+iv∈A.

2.2step 1.2L1L5

In the common-zero alternative, [L1] says that the same unique x0 is the common zero of A. Every uniform limit of members of A vanishes at x0, so A‾⊆Ix0C.

3.1step 2.1L4L6

For every x∈X, [L4] gives ∣F(x)−h(x)∣≤∣Re⁡F(x)−u(x)∣+∣Im⁡F(x)−v(x)∣<ε, so A is dense in C(X,C).

4.1step 1.2step 3.1L1L3L6

Conversely, let F∈Ix0C and let ε>0. Both Re⁡F and Im⁡F vanish at x0; by the real alternative in step 1.2 they can be approximated within ε/2 by u,v∈AR, and the argument of step 3.1 puts u+iv∈A within ε of F. As ε was arbitrary, Ix0C⊆A‾.

5.1step 3.1step 2.2step 4.1L1∎

Steps 2.2, 3.1, and 4.1 transfer both real alternatives to A. If A is unital, it contains the constant-one function and therefore has no common zero, so only the dense alternative is possible.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources