Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n1 and let ek(x)=exp(2πikx), kZn, be the coordinate characters on Tn (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, Fourier coefficients and trigonometric polynomials on the torus). Then:

  1. (ek)kZn is an orthonormal family in the complex Hilbert space L2(Tn);
  2. it is an orthonormal basis: its closed linear span is L2(Tn);
  3. consequently the Fourier expansion f=kZnf^(k)ek and Parseval's identity f22=kZnf^(k)2,f,g=kZnf^(k)g^(k) hold for all f,gL2(Tn), in the finite-subset-net sense; and
  4. the Fourier coefficient map is a surjective linear isometry of L2(Tn) onto 2(Zn,C).

No Hilbert tensor-product identification is used anywhere.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

On the product measure mTn Fubini's theorem computes iterated integrals of L1 functions, and for a product of functions h(x)=jhj(xj) with each hjL1(mT) the integral is the product jhjdmT, by applying Fubini one coordinate at a time; each character has modulus one, so ekel is bounded and hence in L1. In one dimension, the character family is orthonormal (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, The trigonometric characters are orthonormal in L2 of the torus).

[A2]

Tn is compact Hausdorff and its coordinate characters separate points (Finite tori are compact Hausdorff spaces separated by characters).

[A3]

The trigonometric polynomials on Tn are uniformly dense in C(Tn,C) by the unital case of complex Stone–Weierstrass, and the continuous functions are dense in L2(Tn); on the probability space Tn one has g2g (Complex Stone–Weierstrass dichotomy for separating self-adjoint algebras; the unital case is dense, Continuous functions are dense in Lp of finite tori and of bounded intervals, Finite-measure Lr includes into Lp for p<r).

[A4]

L2(Tn) is a complex Hilbert space with inner product fg (L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space), and for a Hilbert space with an orthonormal basis the expansion, Parseval identity and surjectivity of the coefficient isometry hold (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space, A Hilbert space with a given orthonormal basis is 2 of the index set).

[A5]

Orthonormality of a family means ek,el=δkl; completeness means the closed linear span is the whole space (Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, n1, and the coordinate characters ek on Tn.

1.1

For k,lZn, Fubini and separation of variables give ek,el=Tnj<nekj(xj)elj(xj)dmTn=j<nTekjeljdmT, where each factor is δkjlj by orthonormality of the one-dimensional characters; the product is δkl.

A1A5
1.2

The algebra generated by the coordinate characters is unital, self-adjoint and point-separating, so by complex Stone–Weierstrass the trigonometric polynomials on Tn are uniformly dense in C(Tn,C); hence for fL2(Tn) and ε>0 there is a trigonometric polynomial p with fp2<2ε, by first approximating f in L2 by a continuous function and then that function uniformly, using 2.

A2A3
2.1

Since the linear span of the coordinate characters is exactly the set of trigonometric polynomials, step 1.2 shows that the closed linear span of (ek) is all of L2(Tn), that is, the family is orthonormal and complete, hence an orthonormal basis.

step 1.1step 1.2A5
3.1

By the general Fourier expansion and coefficient-isometry theorems applied to this basis, every f is the finite-subset-net sum kZnf^(k)ek, Parseval's norm and pairing identities hold, and the Fourier coefficient map is a surjective linear isometry onto 2(Zn,C).

step 2.1A4
4.1

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 establish orthonormality, basis property, expansion and Parseval with the coefficient isometry, all without invoking any tensor-product identification of L2(Tn) with a tensor power.

step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

111 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources