Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Fourier series on a torus as Peter–Weyl

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For each integer r0 and Tr=(R/Z)r the irreducible finite-dimensional continuous unitary representations are the characters xe2πin,x, nZr, and Peter–Weyl is the usual Fourier orthonormal basis theorem on the torus.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice; the torus Tr with normalized Haar measure dx and its characters en(x)=e2πin,x.

[A1]

The standing Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) covers the choice assumptions of the character, Peter–Weyl and Fourier suppliers.

[L1]

For r1, the characters en, nZr, form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of L2(Tr) with the usual Fourier expansion and Parseval identity (The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus).

[L2]

The normalized matrix coefficients of representatives of the irreducible unitary representations of a compact group form a Hilbert basis of L2 (Peter–Weyl theorem).

[L3]

The character lattice of Tr is Zr with elements en (Characters are the integral weights).

[L4]

Over C, every endomorphism of an irreducible group representation is scalar (Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Let π:TrU(V) be a finite-dimensional continuous irreducible representation. Since Tr is abelian, every π(t) commutes with every π(s) and hence belongs to EndTr(V); by [L4], every π(t) is scalar. Thus every linear subspace of V is invariant, so irreducibility and V0 force dimV=1. Therefore π is a character, and [L3] computes the characters: the quotient exponential RrRr/Zr has kernel Zr, so its allowed differentials are exactly λ(X)=2πijnjXj with njZ. Thus the characters are exactly the en; distinct integer vectors have distinct differentials. Conversely each en is a continuous unitary one-dimensional representation and hence irreducible.

L3L4algebra
2.1

Peter–Weyl [L2] therefore says exactly that the one-dimensional representations en, with their sole normalized matrix coefficient exactly en, form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of L2(Tr) and that the regular representation is their Hilbert direct sum weighted by dimension one. In the fixed left-action convention Lyen=en(y)en, so the coefficient line has type en; negation permutes Zr and every character still occurs once.

L2step 1.1
3.1

For r1, [L1] gives the Fourier expansion and Parseval identity for precisely the basis identified in step 2.1. For r=0, the torus is a singleton, its normalized Haar measure has mass one at that point, and Z0 consists of the empty tuple alone. Its sole character is e0=1 and L2(T0)=C with basis 1; the expansion is f=f(e)1 and Parseval is f22=f(e)2. Thus the zero-rank case is proved directly without applying [L1] outside its scope. The AC assumptions of the suppliers are covered by [A1].

A1L1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources