How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fourier series on a torus as Peter–Weyl
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For each integer and the irreducible finite-dimensional continuous unitary representations are the characters , , and Peter–Weyl is the usual Fourier orthonormal basis theorem on the torus.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice; the torus with normalized Haar measure and its characters .
The standing Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) covers the choice assumptions of the character, Peter–Weyl and Fourier suppliers.
For , the characters , , form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of with the usual Fourier expansion and Parseval identity (The Fourier basis and Parseval's identity on the finite torus).
The normalized matrix coefficients of representatives of the irreducible unitary representations of a compact group form a Hilbert basis of (Peter–Weyl theorem).
The character lattice of is with elements (Characters are the integral weights).
Over , every endomorphism of an irreducible group representation is scalar (Over an algebraically closed field, every endomorphism of an irreducible representation is scalar).
Verification
Let be a finite-dimensional continuous irreducible representation. Since is abelian, every commutes with every and hence belongs to ; by [L4], every is scalar. Thus every linear subspace of is invariant, so irreducibility and force . Therefore is a character, and [L3] computes the characters: the quotient exponential has kernel , so its allowed differentials are exactly with . Thus the characters are exactly the ; distinct integer vectors have distinct differentials. Conversely each is a continuous unitary one-dimensional representation and hence irreducible.
Peter–Weyl [L2] therefore says exactly that the one-dimensional representations , with their sole normalized matrix coefficient exactly , form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of and that the regular representation is their Hilbert direct sum weighted by dimension one. In the fixed left-action convention , so the coefficient line has type ; negation permutes and every character still occurs once.
For , [L1] gives the Fourier expansion and Parseval identity for precisely the basis identified in step 2.1. For , the torus is a singleton, its normalized Haar measure has mass one at that point, and consists of the empty tuple alone. Its sole character is and with basis ; the expansion is and Parseval is . Thus the zero-rank case is proved directly without applying [L1] outside its scope. The AC assumptions of the suppliers are covered by [A1].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)