Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Peter–Weyl theorem

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let G be a compact Lie group with normalized Haar measure dg. Then the normalized matrix coefficients dππij, over a set of representatives (π,Vπ) of the equivalence classes of irreducible unitary finite-dimensional complex representations and orthonormal bases of each Vπ, form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of L2(G); moreover the π-isotypic summand of the left regular representation occurs with multiplicity dimπ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice, a compact Lie group G with normalized Haar measure dg, and the left and right regular representations on L2(G).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it enters through the Haar measure, the Hilbert-space projection/basis theory and the compact-spectral theory cited.

[L1]

Schur orthogonality: with πij(g)=π(g)ej,ei, the family {dππij} over inequivalent irreducible unitary π is orthonormal in L2(G) (Schur orthogonality, Matrix coefficients and characters).

[L2]

The regular actions are unitary and strongly continuous; the dual action is ρ(x)=ρ(x1); every finite-dimensional continuous representation is a direct sum of irreducibles (Left and right regular representations on L2(G), The dual or contragredient complex representation, Complete reducibility for compact Lie groups).

[L3]

For Hermitian continuous k=k, Tk is compact self-adjoint; its nonzero eigenspaces are finite-dimensional and left-invariant, and their closed span is ranTk (Spectral convolution eigenspaces are finite-dimensional and invariant).

[L4]

There are real, nonnegative, inversion-invariant continuous kernels kn of integral one such that TknHH in L2 for every H; moreover TkH is continuous for every continuous k and HL2 (Central continuous approximate identities).

[L5]

A complete orthonormal family gives the norm-convergent finite-subset Fourier expansion (Fourier expansion in a Hilbert space). Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets (Haar measure is positive on nonempty open sets and finite on compact sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

All finite-dimensional unitary representations may be transported to some Cd, so their equivalence classes form a set. By AC choose one representative of each irreducible class and an orthonormal basis in each. Schur orthogonality gives an orthonormal family B={dππij}; write U for its closed linear span. A matrix coefficient of any finite-dimensional continuous unitary representation lies in the algebraic span of B: decompose into irreducibles by [L2] and change finite-dimensional bases. Duals of unitary irreducibles are again continuous unitary irreducibles: their matrices are the conjugates of the original unitary matrices, and a proper nonzero invariant dual subspace would have a proper nonzero invariant annihilator in the original space.

A1L1L2
1.2

Two continuous functions equal Haar-almost everywhere are equal everywhere: a nonzero value of their continuous difference would give a nonempty open set where its modulus is bounded below by a positive number, contrary to [L5]. Thus a class with a continuous representative has a unique such representative.

L5
2.1

Fix n and a nonzero eigenvalue λ of Tkn. Its eigenspace E is finite-dimensional and left-invariant by [L3], since real inversion-invariant kn is Hermitian. Every fE has the continuous representative λ1Tknf by [L4], uniquely by step 1.2. Consequently the restriction σ(x)=LxE is a finite-dimensional continuous unitary representation by [L2], acting also on these continuous representatives. Let :EC be evaluation at e. For each fE, f(x)=(Lx1f)(e)=(σ(x1)f)=(σ(x))(f). In dual bases this is a linear combination of the matrix entries of σ(x), hence belongs to U by step 1.1. Therefore EU.

L2L3L4step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

By [L3] and step 2.1, ranTknU for every n (also when the nonzero-eigenspace family is empty). For any HL2(G), the vectors TknHU converge to H by [L4]. Closedness of U gives U=L2(G). Thus B is a Hilbert basis, and [L5] gives its norm-convergent Fourier expansion.

L3L4L5step 2.1
4.1

For an irreducible ρ, let Vj(ρ)=span{ρij:1idρ}, for 1jdρ. These spaces, including those for distinct representatives, are mutually orthogonal by [L1]. Matrix multiplication gives Lxρij=kρik(x1)ρkj, so the map from the ith dual basis vector to dρρij identifies Vj(ρ) unitarily with ρ. Their Hilbert direct sum is all of L2(G) by step 3.1. To see that there are no further copies of a fixed irreducible π, orthogonal projection onto each such block commutes with Lx: both the block and its orthogonal complement are invariant under the unitary action. Its restriction to an irreducible subrepresentation of type π is an intertwiner, and a nonzero such map to an irreducible block is an isomorphism, since its kernel and image are invariant. It is therefore zero unless ρπ. Completeness of the block sum then places every copy of π in the sum of these blocks. Duality permutes irreducible classes and ππ, so the π-isotypic summand is precisely j=1dπVj(π), with multiplicity dπ. Here π may be replaced by its chosen equivalent representative. The trivial representation supplies the constant function, including for the trivial group. AC covers the selections in step 1.1 and the Haar, spectral and Hilbert-space suppliers.

A1L1L2step 1.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

49 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources