Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Peter–Weyl decomposition of L2(SU(2))

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Use normalized Haar measure and the action ((a,b)f)(g)=f(a1gb). Let V(n) denote the irreducible representation with highest character diag(z,z1)zn, for the upper-triangular positive root. As an SU(2)×SU(2)-module, L2(SU(2))n0^ V(n)V(n), the Hilbert direct sum over n0 of the tensor products of the irreducible representation of highest weight n with its dual; under the left action alone, V(n) occurs with multiplicity n+1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, SU(2), normalized Haar measure and the action in the Example.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice covers the following suppliers and the choice of an invariant inner product and orthonormal basis for each representative.

[L1]

For a compact Lie group, normalized matrix coefficients of one representative of each irreducible unitary class form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of L2(G) (Peter–Weyl theorem).

[L2]

For compact connected G, irreducibles are classified by dominant characters of its actual maximal torus; differentiation restricts such a highest weight to the complexified derived Cartan (Highest weights for compact connected groups, Differentiation and integration of highest weights). No converse correspondence without central data and descent is asserted here.

[L3]

A nonzero irreducible finite-dimensional sl2-module has highest h-eigenvalue n0, weights n,n2,,n each of multiplicity one, and dimension n+1 (Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2).

[L4]

SU(2) is a real Lie group with Lie algebra the skew-Hermitian traceless matrices (Unitary and special unitary Lie groups). Characters of a torus are determined by their differential, with χ(expX)=edχ(X) and integral values on the exponential lattice in units 2πi (Characters are the integral weights).

[L5]

The left and right actions are Laf(g)=f(a1g) and Rbf(g)=f(gb) (Left and right regular representations on L2(G)). Every finite-dimensional continuous representation of a compact Lie group admits an invariant positive-definite Hermitian form (Finite-dimensional compact-group representations are unitarizable).

[L6]

Lie-group homomorphisms intertwine exponential maps, and the exponential map is a local diffeomorphism at zero (Exponential map is natural for Lie-group homomorphisms, The exponential map is a local diffeomorphism at zero).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Every element of SU(2) has the unique form (abba) with a2+b2=1. This identifies it homeomorphically with the unit sphere in R4, which is compact and path connected: non-antipodal points are joined by normalizing their straight segment, and antipodal ones can be joined in two such segments through a perpendicular unit vector. The diagonal circle T={diag(z,z1):z=1} is a maximal torus, since a matrix commuting with one of its elements having distinct eigenvalues must be diagonal; thus its centralizer is T, excluding any larger torus. Put h=diag(1,1), e=E12 and f=E21. The matrices ih,ef,i(e+f) are a real basis of su(2) and a complex basis of sl2(C). Their brackets span the same real space, so the derived algebra is all of su(2). The relations [h,e]=2e,[h,f]=2f,[e,f]=h give the simple coroot h and positive root character z2. By [L4], characters of T are exactly χn(z)=zn for nZ, since its exponential parameter has kernel 2πZ. The complexified differential satisfies dχn(h)=n, and dominance is n0.

L4givenalgebra
2.1

By [L2] and step 1.1 there is exactly one irreducible group representation V(n) for each integer n0, and its differentiated highest weight is n. Its differentiated module is irreducible: if a complex subspace is invariant under dπ(su(2)), it is preserved by every exp(dπ(X))=π(expX) by [L6]. The local exponential image generates the connected group SU(2) of step 1.1, so the subspace is group-invariant and hence is either zero or all of V(n). Complex linearity then makes it irreducible for sl2(C)=su(2)C. Thus [L3] gives dn=dimV(n)=n+1. Choose invariant Hermitian forms and orthonormal bases using [L5] and [A1]. The dual of an irreducible finite-dimensional group representation is irreducible: the annihilator of a proper nonzero invariant subspace of the dual would be a proper nonzero invariant subspace of the original representation. Since double dual returns the original representation, duality permutes all irreducible classes bijectively.

A1L2L3L5L6step 1.1algebra
3.1

For the representation πn on V(n) define the linear coefficient map on the Hilbert tensor product by Cn(vφ)(g)=dnφ(πn(g1)v). Under [L5], Cn(vφ)(a1gb)=dnφ(πn(b1)πn(g1)πn(a)v)=Cn(πn(a)vπn(b)φ)(g). Thus the left factor acts on V(n) and the right factor on its dual, exactly as in the Example. For an orthonormal basis ei with dual basis ej, these are the normalized matrix coefficients of the dual representation: (πn(g)ej)(ei)=ej(πn(g1)ei). Hence [L1] proves that Cn is an isometry and that its images for different n are orthogonal.

L1L5step 2.1algebra
4.1

By step 2.1 the dual representations occurring in step 3.1 exhaust the irreducible classes. Therefore [L1] says the union of the displayed orthonormal coefficient families is complete. The isometry on the algebraic direct sum extends to its Hilbert completion; its image is closed by completeness and dense by that orthonormal basis, hence is all of L2(SU(2)). It is equivariant by step 3.1, proving the stated two-sided decomposition. On restriction to the left group each tensor product is dn copies of V(n), so its multiplicity is n+1. At n=0 the representation is one-dimensional with trivial differential, hence trivial on the connected group, and its coefficient is the constant function 1; at n=1 the block has dimension 4 and left multiplicity 2.

L1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources