How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Peter–Weyl decomposition of L2(SU(2))
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Use normalized Haar measure and the action . Let denote the irreducible representation with highest character , for the upper-triangular positive root. As an -module, the Hilbert direct sum over of the tensor products of the irreducible representation of highest weight with its dual; under the left action alone, occurs with multiplicity .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, , normalized Haar measure and the action in the Example.
The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice covers the following suppliers and the choice of an invariant inner product and orthonormal basis for each representative.
For a compact Lie group, normalized matrix coefficients of one representative of each irreducible unitary class form an orthonormal Hilbert basis of (Peter–Weyl theorem).
For compact connected , irreducibles are classified by dominant characters of its actual maximal torus; differentiation restricts such a highest weight to the complexified derived Cartan (Highest weights for compact connected groups, Differentiation and integration of highest weights). No converse correspondence without central data and descent is asserted here.
A nonzero irreducible finite-dimensional -module has highest -eigenvalue , weights each of multiplicity one, and dimension (Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2).
is a real Lie group with Lie algebra the skew-Hermitian traceless matrices (Unitary and special unitary Lie groups). Characters of a torus are determined by their differential, with and integral values on the exponential lattice in units (Characters are the integral weights).
The left and right actions are and (Left and right regular representations on L2(G)). Every finite-dimensional continuous representation of a compact Lie group admits an invariant positive-definite Hermitian form (Finite-dimensional compact-group representations are unitarizable).
Lie-group homomorphisms intertwine exponential maps, and the exponential map is a local diffeomorphism at zero (Exponential map is natural for Lie-group homomorphisms, The exponential map is a local diffeomorphism at zero).
Verification
Every element of has the unique form with . This identifies it homeomorphically with the unit sphere in , which is compact and path connected: non-antipodal points are joined by normalizing their straight segment, and antipodal ones can be joined in two such segments through a perpendicular unit vector. The diagonal circle is a maximal torus, since a matrix commuting with one of its elements having distinct eigenvalues must be diagonal; thus its centralizer is , excluding any larger torus. Put , and . The matrices are a real basis of and a complex basis of . Their brackets span the same real space, so the derived algebra is all of . The relations give the simple coroot and positive root character . By [L4], characters of are exactly for , since its exponential parameter has kernel . The complexified differential satisfies , and dominance is .
By [L2] and step 1.1 there is exactly one irreducible group representation for each integer , and its differentiated highest weight is . Its differentiated module is irreducible: if a complex subspace is invariant under , it is preserved by every by [L6]. The local exponential image generates the connected group of step 1.1, so the subspace is group-invariant and hence is either zero or all of . Complex linearity then makes it irreducible for . Thus [L3] gives . Choose invariant Hermitian forms and orthonormal bases using [L5] and [A1]. The dual of an irreducible finite-dimensional group representation is irreducible: the annihilator of a proper nonzero invariant subspace of the dual would be a proper nonzero invariant subspace of the original representation. Since double dual returns the original representation, duality permutes all irreducible classes bijectively.
For the representation on define the linear coefficient map on the Hilbert tensor product by . Under [L5], . Thus the left factor acts on and the right factor on its dual, exactly as in the Example. For an orthonormal basis with dual basis , these are the normalized matrix coefficients of the dual representation: . Hence [L1] proves that is an isometry and that its images for different are orthogonal.
By step 2.1 the dual representations occurring in step 3.1 exhaust the irreducible classes. Therefore [L1] says the union of the displayed orthonormal coefficient families is complete. The isometry on the algebraic direct sum extends to its Hilbert completion; its image is closed by completeness and dense by that orthonormal basis, hence is all of . It is equivariant by step 3.1, proving the stated two-sided decomposition. On restriction to the left group each tensor product is copies of , so its multiplicity is . At the representation is one-dimensional with trivial differential, hence trivial on the connected group, and its coefficient is the constant function ; at the block has dimension and left multiplicity .
Depends on
- Peter–Weyl theorem
- Highest weights for compact connected groups
- Differentiation and integration of highest weights
- The Axiom of Choice
- Finite-dimensional representations of sl_2
- Unitary and special unitary Lie groups
- Characters are the integral weights
- Exponential map is natural for Lie-group homomorphisms
- The exponential map is a local diffeomorphism at zero
- Left and right regular representations on L2(G)
- Finite-dimensional compact-group representations are unitarizable
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)