How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete reducibility for compact Lie groups
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every finite-dimensional continuous complex representation of a compact Lie group is a direct sum of irreducible representations.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice, a compact Lie group and a finite-dimensional complex representation .
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it enters through [L1].
Every finite-dimensional continuous complex representation of preserves some positive-definite Hermitian inner product, so it may be regarded as unitary for that inner product (Finite-dimensional compact-group representations are unitarizable, Continuous and unitary representations).
A subrepresentation of is a linear subspace stable under every ; is irreducible when and there is no nonzero proper subrepresentation, and a direct sum of subrepresentations is a decomposition into representations by restriction (Continuous and unitary representations).
For every subspace of a finite-dimensional inner-product space , one has and (For a subspace of a finite-dimensional inner product space, , In finite dimension, and ). A proper subspace of a finite-dimensional space has smaller dimension, and the zero representation is the direct sum of the empty family. [finite-dimensional linear algebra, empty-sum convention]
Proof
We argue by induction on , assuming the assertion for all representation spaces of dimension . If then is the empty direct sum of irreducibles by [L3]; otherwise has a nonzero subrepresentation, and choosing among the nonzero subrepresentations one of least positive dimension gives an irreducible subrepresentation , since any nonzero proper subrepresentation of would be a nonzero subrepresentation of of strictly smaller positive dimension by [L3].
By [L1] fix a -invariant positive-definite Hermitian inner product on and let be the orthogonal complement of ; then is a subrepresentation, because for , and unitarity and invariance of give with , so .
Since , [L3] gives , so the inductive hypothesis applies to the subrepresentation and exhibits it as a direct sum of irreducible subrepresentations; adjoining the irreducible summand gives as a direct sum of irreducibles by [L2]. The Axiom of Choice entered only through [L1].
Depends on
Used by
- Dominant characters form the representation-ring basis Corollary
- Peter–Weyl gives density, not finite equality False statement
- Peter–Weyl theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)
- Alexander Kirillov Jr., An Introduction to Lie Groups and Lie Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)