How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Matrix coefficients are uniformly dense in C(G)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Finite linear combinations of matrix coefficients of finite-dimensional unitary representations are uniformly dense in for a compact Lie group .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice, a compact Lie group with normalized Haar measure, and .
The Axiom of Choice is The Axiom of Choice; it enters through the Haar and Hilbert-space theory cited.
The normalized matrix coefficients form a Hilbert basis of , so every element of is the finite-subset-net limit of finite matrix-coefficient sums (Peter–Weyl theorem).
There are continuous central functions of integral one with uniformly for continuous ; because is compact (Central continuous approximate identities).
Proof
Since is continuous on the compact group, and ; fix and choose with by [L2], so that for every .
By [L1] applied to the class of , there is a finite linear combination of matrix coefficients with when (and the conclusion below is trivial when ).
For every , the defining formula for the convolution operators gives by Cauchy–Schwarz and Haar invariance. Hence by step 1.1. The function is a finite linear combination of matrix coefficients: if a summand of is , then so its contribution to is a finite sum of the constants times the matrix coefficients of the contragredient representation. Thus a finite matrix-coefficient sum lies within of uniformly.
The zero function is approximated by the zero linear combination, and the same argument includes the one-element group. All noncanonical existence used above is contained in the Haar, Hilbert-space and representation-theoretic suppliers invoked in [L1] and [L2], under the Axiom of Choice assumed in [A1].
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-dimensional representations separate points Corollary
- Peter–Weyl gives density, not finite equality False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)