Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A boundary truth can give an equal-tailed credible interval zero coverage

Statement refuted

Every equal-tailed posterior credible interval has frequentist coverage at least its nominal level, even when the truth is on the boundary of the parameter space.

Setup

For 0<α<1, observe X1,…,Xn IID Bernoulli(θ) with parameter space Θ=[0,1] and prior density π(θ)=1 on [0,1]. For every data vector, let Cn be the equal-tailed posterior interval between the α/2 and 1−α/2 posterior quantiles. The truth θ0=0 lies on the boundary. Under this truth all observations are zero with probability one. The posterior density is then (n+1)(1−θ)n, with CDF Fn(t)=1−(1−t)n+1 on [0,1]. Its lower endpoint is qα/2=1−(1−α/2)1/(n+1)>0, so the interval excludes θ0 for every n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Bernoulli model, uniform prior, and equal-tailed posterior interval in the Counterexample.

[F1]

Posterior credible set: a graph-measurable set rule is level-1−α credible when its posterior probability is at least 1−α for each data value.

[F2]

Bayes formula for dominated kernels: a dominated prior and sampling model give posterior density proportional to prior density times likelihood when the marginal likelihood is positive and finite.

[L1]

At a fixed parameter θ, the frequentist coverage of a set rule C is Pθ{θ∈C(Y)}.

[A1]

In the usual topology on [0,1], θ0=0 is a boundary point and is not an interior point.

Refutation

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

For data with k successes, the likelihood is θk(1−θ)n−k. It is bounded by 1 and positive for 0<θ<1, so its integral against the uniform prior is finite and strictly positive. [F2] therefore gives the posterior density proportional to that likelihood. The sample space is finite for fixed n, so the interval rule's membership graph is a finite union of measurable slices. The posterior density is positive on (0,1), making its CDF continuous and strictly increasing there; the posterior probability between its two quantiles is (1−α/2)−α/2=1−α. Thus the rule is credible by [F1].

1.2givenalgebra

At θ0=0, the data are all zero with probability one, so the likelihood is (1−θ)n. Its normalizing integral is ∫01(1−θ)ndθ=1/(n+1), giving posterior density (n+1)(1−θ)n and CDF Fn(t)=1−(1−t)n+1. Solving Fn(qu)=u yields qu=1−(1−u)1/(n+1). In particular qα/2>0, so 0∉Cn for every n.

2.1A1L1step 1.2algebra∎

Because the truth is zero and all data are zero almost surely, [L1] gives frequentist coverage P0{0∈Cn(X1,…,Xn)}=0. This contradicts the asserted lower bound 1−α>0 and exhibits failure at the boundary identified in [A1].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.