How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Functional BvM limits and credible-set calibration — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Bayesian models, priors, and posterior laws
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Brownian Motion Construction and Continuity
- Brownian Motion, Markov Properties and Hitting Times
- Central Limit Theorems
- Characteristic Functions Inversion and Continuity
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Complete Metrizability, Čech-Completeness, and Baire Category
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Conditional Distributions and Regular Conditional Probability
- Conditional Expectation
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugate families and Gaussian conditioning
- Connectedness
- Consistency and Limiting Distributions
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Domination and Likelihood Ratios
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Probability and the Probabilistic Method
- Finite Probability Spaces and Random Variables
- Finite-history linear prediction
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Functional BvM limits and credible-set calibration
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Gaussian-process priors and finite posterior laws
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- IID posterior contraction by entropy and prior mass
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Independence Borel Cantelli and Zero One Laws
- Infinite Product Measures and Kolmogorov Extension
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Lebesgue-Stieltjes Measures and Distribution Functions
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modes of Convergence for Random Variables
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Posterior Prediction, Credible Sets, and Bayes Actions
- Posterior propriety and dominated Bayes formula
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Probability Spaces Random Variables and Expectation
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Splitting Fields
- State-space model laws
- Statistical Experiments, Models and Identifiability
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Sufficiency, Completeness and Exponential Families
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Convergence Tightness and Representation
- Weak Laws and Series of Independent Random Variables
- Weak nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises limits
2 · Summary
Objective
These examples verify a smooth white-noise functional, show a nonlinear remainder that survives at the root-n scale, and instantiate the declared type-S and type-H prior conditions at a uniform truth. The final counterexample separates posterior credibility from frequentist coverage when no BvM condition is available.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A boundary truth can give an equal-tailed credible interval zero coverage
Statement refuted
Every equal-tailed posterior credible interval has frequentist coverage at least its nominal level, even when the truth is on the boundary of the parameter space.
Setup
For , observe IID Bernoulli with parameter space and prior density on . For every data vector, let be the equal-tailed posterior interval between the and posterior quantiles. The truth lies on the boundary. Under this truth all observations are zero with probability one. The posterior density is then , with CDF on . Its lower endpoint is , so the interval excludes for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Bernoulli model, uniform prior, and equal-tailed posterior interval in the Counterexample.
Posterior credible set: a graph-measurable set rule is level- credible when its posterior probability is at least for each data value.
Bayes formula for dominated kernels: a dominated prior and sampling model give posterior density proportional to prior density times likelihood when the marginal likelihood is positive and finite.
At a fixed parameter , the frequentist coverage of a set rule is .
In the usual topology on , is a boundary point and is not an interior point.
Refutation
For data with successes, the likelihood is . It is bounded by and positive for , so its integral against the uniform prior is finite and strictly positive. [F2] therefore gives the posterior density proportional to that likelihood. The sample space is finite for fixed , so the interval rule's membership graph is a finite union of measurable slices. The posterior density is positive on , making its CDF continuous and strictly increasing there; the posterior probability between its two quantiles is . Thus the rule is credible by [F1].
At , the data are all zero with probability one, so the likelihood is . Its normalizing integral is , giving posterior density and CDF . Solving yields . In particular , so for every .
Because the truth is zero and all data are zero almost surely, [L1] gives frequentist coverage . This contradicts the asserted lower bound and exhibits failure at the boundary identified in [A1].
Uniform truth under type-S and type-H density priors
Example
The uniform truth meets the truth-side smoothness and positive-bound conditions for both a type-S log-density prior and a type-H dyadic histogram prior. The weight sequence is admissible and also satisfies the extra summability needed for the CDF map. Thus the source-specific posterior BvM and credible-band conclusions of Type-S and Type-H density credible bands have asymptotically exact coverage apply to these choices.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The type-S/type-H definitions of Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families and the admissible multiscale space of Little-o multiscale coefficient space M0(w).
Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families: both families require a density bounded above and bounded away from zero; type S1 requires with , type S2 uses and , while type H requires for and the displayed Dirichlet-parameter bounds.
Little-o multiscale coefficient space M0(w): admissibility means .
Type-S and Type-H density credible bands have asymptotically exact coverage: the specified prior regimes, truth bounds and admissible summable weights imply posterior weak BvM and asymptotically exact multiscale and CDF credible-band coverage.
Verification
Given: The prior families and on .
Since and , its wavelet coefficient smoothness norm is finite at every order and it is bounded above and away from zero. For type S1 choose and the Laplace density , whose logarithm is Lipschitz; its scales are . For type S2 choose and , which satisfies .
For type H choose truth smoothness , hyperparameters , and for every cell. Then , and the uniform truth belongs to .
The sequence is nondecreasing, since both entries in the maximum are nondecreasing for . It satisfies . Also because the ratio of successive terms tends to . Thus it is admissible and meets the CDF primitive summability condition. Steps 1.1–1.2 verify every regime and truth premise of [F3], so its posterior BvM and credible-band conclusions apply to these examples.
A quadratic remainder at L2 radius n^(-1/4)
Example
Let at . The derivative is nonzero, but the quadratic remainder is not negligible at perturbations of size : for any unit vector and integers , has -scaled remainder equal to . This sequence does not satisfy the stronger radius premise in Nonlinear-functional BvM limit under fast L2 contraction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , and .
Nonlinear-functional BvM limit under fast L2 contraction: its Taylor remainder must be uniformly quadratic near , and its posterior radius must be for the stated BvM conclusion.
Verification
Given: The functional and unit vector in the Example.
Expanding the inner product gives . Thus the derivative is , which is nonzero, and the remainder equals .
For integers and , and . Hence the scaled quadratic remainder does not tend to zero along this sequence, so the linear approximation needed in [F1] is not justified at this radius.
The integral functional under a product-prior white-noise BvM
Example
Take a sufficiently regular Cohen–Daubechies–Vial wavelet basis as in Weak nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorem for product priors, with constants contained in a finite coarsest scaling space and all finer wavelets orthogonal to constants. Let , use independent standard-normal product coefficients, and choose any prior scale exponent with . The functional has asymptotically standard-normal posterior fluctuations centered at , and its equal-tailed posterior interval has asymptotic frequentist coverage .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The white-noise model, , the selected regular CDV basis, independent standard-normal prior coefficients scaled by , and the supplied posterior kernel in Weak nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorem for product priors.
Linear-functional BvM limit and credible-interval calibration: any nonzero , , yields a scalar posterior BvM limit and asymptotic coverage for the equal-tailed interval under the product-prior theorem's hypotheses.
Weak nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorem for product priors: the prior uses scales and requires a bounded density positive near the normalized true coefficients, finite coefficient second moment, the coefficient bound, continuity at those coefficients, and countable choice for the prior construction.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): countable choice supplies a choice function for a countable family of nonempty sets; here it is the axiom explicitly assumed for the product-prior construction.
For the selected CDV basis, constants lie in the finite coarse scaling space and every wavelet above its finite base level is orthogonal to constants.
Verification
Given: The hypotheses in the Example and Facts & Assumptions, with countable choice for the prior construction.
The standard-normal coefficient density is bounded, continuous, strictly positive at every real value, and has finite second moment. Since , every normalized true coefficient is zero; choose any with . The coefficient bound and continuity at each normalized true coefficient required by [F3] hold, and the scale sequence has the theorem's required form with .
By [A1], all wavelet coefficients of above a fixed finite level vanish; the remaining levels have finitely many coefficients. Therefore for every finite , in particular for some . Also and its pairing is .
Under and countable choice [F4], is exactly . Applying [F2] with gives the scalar posterior BvM limit and limiting coverage .
Sources
- Castillo and Nickl, On the Bernstein–von Mises phenomenon for nonparametric Bayes procedures, §3.2
- Castillo and Nickl, Nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorems in Gaussian white noise, Condition 1 and Theorem 3
- Castillo and Nickl, On the Bernstein–von Mises phenomenon for nonparametric Bayes procedures, §2.2