Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.

State-space model laws

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

For a finite horizon T, a state-space model specifies a joint law for a latent state path X0,…,XT and observations Y1,…,YT on finite products of standard-Borel spaces. The general contract gives an initial law, one transition probability kernel per state step, and one observation probability kernel per observation step. The ordered iterated kernel integral is the joint law; its factors are kernels, not densities. Existence and uniqueness use the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) through the history-dependent Ionescu–Tulcea construction.

The separate linear-Gaussian subclass states dimensions, matrices, Gaussian initial/process/observation noises, mutual independence across all noise vectors, and positive-semidefinite covariance matrices. Its finite path law is multivariate normal even when singular. This finite-horizon definition does not require stationarity: no shift invariance of finite-dimensional laws is assumed, and no constant-mean or lag-covariance condition is imposed (Strict and weak stationarity for integer-indexed time series). It supplies no filtering algorithm, posterior recursion, or convergence result. An innovation covariance is the covariance of an observation prediction residual; any downstream formula that inverts it must assume positive definiteness, meaning uTSu>0 for every nonzero u.

Model contract for this pair

The observed record is the coordinate tuple DT=(Y1,…,YT) in the finite product ∏t=1TFt; the latent state path is (X0,…,XT). Both are random elements under the joint path law, and DT is the observed projection of that path (Random elements and real random variables, Law or distribution of a random element, The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates). The time origin is 0: Xt is the state at step t, and Yt is the observation at step t. Physical or biological units, sampling frame, and any target population remain application-specific fields of the scientific model contract (Scientific statistical model contracts).

The analysis law here is the joint finite-horizon law. No treatment assignment, estimator, parameter index, stationarity, or ergodicity assumption is added. The model contract does not show that its law describes an application adequately; that is an empirical question under Scientific statistical model contracts.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A finite stack of independent Gaussian vectors is jointly Gaussian

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let m≥1 be finite, let dj≥1, and let Zj for 1≤j≤m be mutually independent random elements of Rdj. Suppose Zj∼Ndj(aj,Σj), where each Σj is symmetric positive semidefinite. Put D=∑j=1mdj, Z=(Z1,…,Zm), a=(a1,…,am), and Σ=diag⁡(Σ1,…,Σm). Then Z∼ND(a,Σ). No covariance block needs to be invertible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume AC and mutually independent Borel random vectors Zj∼Ndj(aj,Σj) for a finite nonempty index set.

[A1]

AC is the explicit axiom used by the multivariate-normal existence, scalar characteristic-function uniqueness, and Cramer–Wold suppliers below. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

Independence of random elements means independence of their generated sigma-algebras. (Independent random elements)

[F2]

A finite mutually independent family of random elements has product joint law. (Independent random elements have product joint law)

[F3]

Under AC, Nd(a,Σ) exists for every finite d≥1 and symmetric positive-semidefinite Σ, and every scalar projection has its specified normal law. (Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance)

[F4]

Under AC, the characteristic function of Nd(a,Σ) is exp⁡(iu⋅a−uTΣu/2), including singular Σ. (Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law)

[F5]

Characteristic functions of finite sums of mutually independent real random variables multiply. (Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums)

[F6]

Under AC, equal characteristic functions determine equal Borel probability laws on R. (Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function)

[F7]

Under AC, all one-dimensional projection laws determine a Borel probability law on finite-dimensional Euclidean space. (Cramer wold device)

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3

By [F2], the finite tuple Z is a Borel random vector with product joint law. For any u=(u1,…,um), each scalar map zj↦uj⋅zj is Borel, so preimages of Borel sets lie in σ(Zj). Independence [F1] therefore makes the scalars uj⋅Zj mutually independent. By [A1, F3], each is normal with mean uj⋅aj and variance ujTΣjuj.

2.1F4F5F6step 1.1algebra

For any s∈R, [F5] and [F4] give φu⋅Z(s)=∏j=1mexp⁡ ⁣(is uj⋅aj−12s2ujTΣjuj)=exp⁡ ⁣(is u⋅a−12s2uTΣu). The last expression is the characteristic function of N1(u⋅a,uTΣu) by [F4] in dimension one. Scalar uniqueness [F6] gives u⋅Z∼N1(u⋅a,uTΣu), including the zero-variance point-mass case.

3.1A1F3F7step 2.1algebra∎

The block matrix Σ is positive semidefinite because uTΣu=∑jujTΣjuj≥0. By [A1, F3], the law ND(a,Σ) exists and its projection laws are the normal laws found in step 2.1. Cramer–Wold [F7] therefore identifies the law of Z with ND(a,Σ). This also covers singular blocks and uses no inverse.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

General finite-horizon state-space models by kernels

Definition

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice) and fix a finite horizon T≥0. For 0≤t≤T, let (Et,Et) be a standard-Borel state space; for 1≤t≤T, let (Ft,Ft) be a standard-Borel observation space (Standard Borel spaces), meaning a measurable space bimeasurably isomorphic to a Polish space. A probability kernel has probability-measure sections and measurable evaluations as in Measure kernel and probability kernel. Specify an initial probability measure μ0 on E0 (a measure of total mass one, as in Probability measures and probability spaces), transition probability kernels Kt from Et−1 to Et, and observation probability kernels Gt from Et to Ft, for 1≤t≤T.

The trajectory space, with the finite product sigma-algebra generated by measurable coordinate rectangles (The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates), is ZT=E0×E1×F1×⋯×ET×FT, with Z0=E0. Its finite-horizon law PT is the unique probability law whose ordered iterated kernel integral is μ0(dx0)∏t=1TKt(xt−1,dxt)Gt(xt,dyt). The product notation means successive integration in the displayed order; it does not assert the existence of densities. Existence and uniqueness under AC are proved in Finite-horizon state-space kernel law exists and is unique ↗. Every finite product trajectory space is standard Borel by Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel.

The initial and transition laws specify the state evolution, while each Gt specifies the observation law given the current state in this model. State evolution by itself therefore does not specify a joint state-observation law. No density or time-homogeneity assumption is imposed, and no strict stationarity assumption (shift invariance of all finite-dimensional laws) is required (Strict and weak stationarity for integer-indexed time series). This is a single law, not a parameter-indexed family. The model contract records a proposed law and makes no claim that it adequately describes an application (Scientific statistical model contracts).

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Finite-horizon state-space kernel law exists and is unique

Statement

Assume AC. Fix a finite horizon T≥0, standard-Borel spaces E0,…,ET and F1,…,FT, an initial probability measure μ0 on E0, and transition and observation probability kernels Kt:Et−1→Et and Gt:Et→Ft for 1≤t≤T, as in General finite-horizon state-space models by kernels. On the interleaved finite product space ZT=E0×E1×F1×⋯×ET×FT, there is a unique probability measure whose rectangle probabilities are the ordered iterated kernel integrals μ0(dx0)∏t=1TKt(xt−1,dxt)Gt(xt,dyt). The product notation means successive integration in the displayed order. For T=0, the assertion is the initial law μ0 on E0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume AC and the finite-horizon spaces, initial law, and kernels in the Statement.

[A1]

AC asserts that every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

A finite-horizon model consists of standard-Borel state and observation spaces, an initial law, transition probability kernels, and observation probability kernels. (General finite-horizon state-space models by kernels)

[F2]

A probability kernel has probability-measure sections and measurable evaluations. (Measure kernel and probability kernel)

[F3]

Under AC, an initial probability measure and a sequence of probability kernels on measurable spaces give a unique path-space probability whose finite-prefix laws are their iterated integrals. (Ionescu-Tulcea construction of a Markov chain)

[F4]

Every finite product of standard-Borel spaces, with the finite-product sigma-algebra, is standard Borel. (Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel)

[F5]

The finite-product sigma-algebra is generated by its measurable rectangles. (The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates)

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1F1F2F5givenconstruct

If T=0, then Z0=E0 and μ0 is the unique asserted law. For T≥1, interleave the coordinate spaces as D0=E0, D2t−1=Et, and D2t=Ft for 1≤t≤T. At the transition to Et, define the lifted kernel by L2t−2(h,A)=Kt(πt−1(h),A), where πt−1 selects the Et−1 coordinate of the preceding history h; at the next transition define L2t−1(h,B)=Gt(πt(h),B), where πt selects the newly adjoined Et coordinate. These projections are measurable because inverse images of measurable sets are product cylinders. Each lifted section is a probability measure, and each evaluation is measurable by composition, so [F2] makes every lift a probability kernel. After coordinate D2T, append singleton spaces with their unit point-mass kernels.

2.1A1F3F4step 1.1

By [A1] and [F3], Ionescu–Tulcea gives a unique probability measure on the countable interleaved product with these lifted kernels. Its marginal on the first 2T+1 coordinates is a probability measure on ZT; the prescribed prefix formula is exactly the displayed iterated integral. The finite product is standard Borel by [F4].

3.1A1F3F5step 2.1∎

Suppose QT is another probability measure on ZT with the same displayed rectangle probabilities. Append the singleton tail to the coordinate tuple by a measurable map and push QT forward to the countable product. For any shorter prefix, set all later coordinate sets in the rectangle formula to their whole spaces; the later probability kernels integrate to one, so each shorter marginal is the prescribed iterated integral. Prefixes after D2T add only deterministic singleton coordinates. Ionescu–Tulcea uniqueness [F3] identifies this extension with the measure in step 2.1, so their finite-prefix marginals agree and QT equals that marginal. For T=0, the formula already fixes Q0=μ0.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises

Definition

Assume AC (The Axiom of Choice) and fix a finite horizon T≥0. Let the state dimension at time t be a positive integer dt for 0≤t≤T, and the observation dimension at time t be a positive integer pt for 1≤t≤T. Choose deterministic matrices Ft∈Rdt×dt−1 and Ht∈Rpt×dt, a mean m0∈Rd0, and symmetric positive-semidefinite matrices, meaning vTPv≥0 for every real vector v of matching dimension, P0∈Rd0×d0, Qt∈Rdt×dt, and Rt∈Rpt×pt. A linear-Gaussian state-space model with independent noises is the general finite-horizon kernel model (General finite-horizon state-space models by kernels) with initial law μ0=Nd0(m0,P0) and transition and observation kernels Kt(x,⋅)=Ndt(Ftx,Qt),Gt(x,⋅)=Npt(Htx,Rt). All Gaussian laws use the convention of Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance, which allows singular covariance matrices.

Its independent-noise representation consists of random vectors x0,q1,r1,…,qT,rT on a common probability space, with x0∼Nd0(m0,P0), qt∼Ndt(0,Qt), rt∼Npt(0,Rt), all mutually independent in the sense of Independent random elements (their generated sigma-algebras are independent), and equations xt=Ftxt−1+qt,yt=Htxt+rt(1≤t≤T). The local path-law theorem proves that every allowed parameter tuple has such a finite representation, that its induced kernels are the displayed Kt,Gt, and that its path law is the general kernel-product law.

This definition imposes the stated noise law and independence assumptions; it does not establish their empirical adequacy. It supplies no filtering algorithm, posterior recursion, or convergence claim. Any separate formula that inverts an observed innovation covariance must assume that covariance is positive definite at the point of inversion.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The finite linear-Gaussian state-space path is jointly Gaussian

Statement

Assume AC and fix a finite-horizon model of Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises. There is a probability space carrying mutually independent Gaussian vectors x0,q1,r1,…,qT,rT with the stated laws. The recursions xt=Ftxt−1+qt and yt=Htxt+rt induce the general kernel-product law of General finite-horizon state-space models by kernels. In the interleaved order ZT=(x0,x1,y1,…,xT,yT), there is a deterministic matrix MT such that ZT=MTWT,WT=(x0,q1,r1,…,qT,rT), and ZT∼N ⁣(MTaT, MTΣTMTT),aT=(m0,0,…,0),ΣT=diag⁡(P0,Q1,R1,…,QT,RT). The covariance may be singular.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC and a finite-horizon parameter tuple from the linear-Gaussian definition, with every initial/process/observation covariance symmetric positive semidefinite.

[A1]

AC is used by the multivariate-normal construction, characteristic-law uniqueness, Cramer–Wold, and Ionescu–Tulcea suppliers below. (The Axiom of Choice)

[F1]

The model has Gaussian initial, transition and observation laws, and its independent-noise representation uses the displayed linear recursions. (Linear-Gaussian state-space models with independent noises)

[F2]

Under AC, every positive-semidefinite covariance defines a multivariate normal probability law, including singular covariances. (Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance)

[F3]

Finite products of probability measures exist by the sigma-finite product measure theorem and have the rectangle formula. (For sigma-finite factors, the product measure exists, has the rectangle formula, is sigma-finite, and is unique)

[F4]

Independence of random elements is independence of their generated sigma-algebras, and a finite independent family has product joint law. (Independent random elements, Independent random elements have product joint law)

[F5]

Tonelli's theorem permits iterated integration of nonnegative product- measurable functions against sigma-finite product measures. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)

[F6]

A probability kernel has probability-measure sections and measurable evaluations. (Measure kernel and probability kernel)

[F7]

Integrating a nonnegative product-measurable function against a probability kernel gives a measurable evaluation function. (Measurability of integration against a kernel)

[F8]

Under AC, the characteristic function of a multivariate normal law is exp⁡(iu⋅a−uTΣu/2) and uniquely determines the law, including singular covariance. (Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law)

[F9]

Scalar affine transformations have the stated characteristic-function formula. (Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums)

[F10]

The finite-horizon kernel law exists uniquely and has the stated ordered iterated-integral formula. (Finite-horizon state-space kernel law exists and is unique)

[F11]

A finite stack of mutually independent Gaussian vectors is multivariate normal with block-diagonal covariance. (A finite stack of independent Gaussian vectors is jointly Gaussian)

[F12]

Finite products of standard-Borel spaces are standard Borel. (Finite products of standard Borel spaces are standard Borel)

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

1.1A1F1F2F3F4givenconstruct

Each Gaussian marginal law in the model exists on its finite-dimensional Euclidean Borel space. Repeatedly applying the finite-product measure construction creates a finite product probability space with these marginals. Its coordinate maps x0,q1,r1,…,qT,rT have the prescribed marginals, and the rectangle formula gives product probabilities on all measurable coordinate rectangles. Therefore the generated sigma-algebras are mutually independent, and the finite family has the product joint law. Thus this space supplies the required independent Gaussian noise vectors.

1.2A1F1F2F6F7F8F9given

For a Borel set A⊆Rdt, define Kt(x,A)=∫1A(Ftx+z) Ndt(0,Qt)(dz); define Gt analogously using Ht and Npt(0,Rt). The maps (x,z)↦Ftx+z and (x,z)↦Htx+z are continuous, so the integrands are product-measurable. Each fixed-state section is a pushforward probability measure. Regard each fixed Gaussian noise law as a constant probability kernel. Kernel integration then makes the evaluations measurable in the state argument, so both families are probability kernels. For fixed x and any u, the scalar affine characteristic-function identity applied to uTqt, together with the multivariate-normal characteristic-function formula, gives E[eiuT(Ftx+qt)]=exp⁡(iuTFtx−12uTQtu). This is the multivariate-normal characteristic function with mean Ftx and covariance Qt, so its uniqueness identifies the translated law with Ndt(Ftx,Qt). The same calculation with Ht,rt,Rt identifies Gt. No covariance inverse is used.

2.1A1F1F5F10F12step 1.1step 1.2

Let ϕ be any nonnegative Borel function on the finite trajectory space. The recursion is a finite composition of continuous affine maps, so ϕ(ZT) is measurable. By Tonelli, integrate the noise product law from step 1.1 backward, starting with the last pair (qT,rT). For each fixed preceding history, the integral over qT is the pushforward through xT=FTxT−1+qT, hence equals integration against KT; the following integral over rT is the pushforward through yT=HTxT+rT, hence equals integration against GT. Repeating this argument for t=T−1,…,1 and finally integrating x0 against μ0 gives E[ϕ(ZT)]=∫μ0(dx0)∏t=1TKt(xt−1,dxt)Gt(xt,dyt) ϕ(x0,x1,y1,…,xT,yT). For T=0, it is simply integration against μ0. This is exactly the unique general model law, and the trajectory space is standard Borel.

3.1A1F1F2F11step 1.1algebra∎

The stacked-noise lemma gives the vector WT the multivariate normal law N(aT,ΣT). Successive substitution in the two recursions shows by finite induction that each coordinate of ZT is a linear function of WT; collecting those coefficients gives a deterministic matrix MT. For any vector u, uTZT=(MTTu)TWT, whose law is normal with mean uTMTaT and variance uTMTΣTMTTu. The multivariate-normal projection definition gives ZT∼N(MTaT,MTΣTMTT). The covariance is positive semidefinite because vTΣTv≥0 implies uTMTΣTMTTu=(MTTu)TΣT(MTTu)≥0. Thus singular covariances are included and no inverse is needed.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources