Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite variance is not compact support

Statement refuted

Assume countable choice. Every nonzero f∈L2(Rn;C) with finite second moments in both domains vanishes almost everywhere outside a compact set, and so does f^; equivalently, finite variance forces compact support.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, an integer n≥1, a real a>0, and the Gaussian f(x)=e−πa∣x∣2.

[F1]

Countable choice is assumed; it is the hypothesis carried by the Gaussian transform identity and the change-of-variables substitution below (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F2]

For every t>0 the Gaussian e−πt∣x∣2 is absolutely integrable with ∫Rne−πt∣x∣2dx=t−n/2 and L1 Fourier transform t−n/2e−π∣ξ∣2/t (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization); every polynomial times a positive real Gaussian is absolutely integrable. For L1∩L2 functions this integral transform represents the Plancherel transform (Agreement of the integral and L2 transforms); the one-dimensional Gaussian integral is ∫Re−s2ds=π (The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π).

[F3]

Complex L1 change of variables: for the reflection T(x)=−x, which is a C1 diffeomorphism with ∣det⁡DT∣=1, one has ∫h(−x)dx=∫h(y)dy (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F4]

Means and variances for a nonzero L2 function with finite second moments are as in Spatial and frequency centres and variances of an L2 function with finite second moments; the support-measure hypothesis that is not satisfied here is the one of The support-measure uncertainty inequality ∣E∣∣F∣≥1.

[F5]

Compact subsets of Rn are bounded (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line), and every box has its product-of-side-lengths Lebesgue measure under Countable Choice (A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included). Thus a compact set is contained in a finite-measure cube, whereas Rn has infinite measure since it contains cubes [−R,R]n of measure (2R)n for all R>0.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

The Gaussian and its transform are strictly positive and integrable. f(x)=e−πa∣x∣2>0 for every x, f is continuous and even, and by [F2] with t=2a, ∥f∥22=∫Rnf2=(2a)−n/2<∞, so f∈L1∩L2 and [F2] identifies its integral and Plancherel transforms, with f^(ξ)=a−n/2e−π∣ξ∣2/a>0 for every ξ∈Rn.

2.1F2F3F4givenstep 1.1

Finite second moments and vanishing means. By [F2] with t=2a one has ∥f∥22=(2a)−n/2<∞, and since ∣f^(ξ)∣2=a−ne−2π∣ξ∣2/a, [F2] with t=2/a gives ∥f^∥22=(2a)−n/2<∞ as well. By [F2], ∣x∣2e−2πa∣x∣2 and ∣ξ∣2a−ne−2π∣ξ∣2/a are integrable polynomial multiples of positive Gaussians. Thus both second moments are finite. The functions x↦xj∣f(x)∣2 and ξ↦ξj∣f^(ξ)∣2 are odd in their j-th coordinate while f and f^ are even, so [F3] applied to the reflection T(x)=−x shows that each of these integrals equals its own negative and hence vanishes; consequently both means are 0 and the variances Vx(f),Vξ(f) of [F4] are finite.

3.1F4F5givenstep 1.1step 2.1∎

No finite-measure support in either domain. Let E⊆Rn be measurable with f=0 almost everywhere on Rn∖E. Since f>0 everywhere, the set where f differs from 0 inside Rn∖E is Rn∖E itself, so Rn∖E is null and E has full measure, ∣E∣=∞; the same argument with the strictly positive transform f^ shows that no measurable F of finite measure can carry f^=0 almost everywhere off it. By [F5], compact sets have finite measure, so neither function can have compact support. Consequently the counterexample has finite second moments and finite variances in both domains but neither it nor its transform is supported (a.e.) on a set of finite measure, so finite variance does not force compact support, and the support-measure hypothesis of [F4] is not implied by the variance hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources