Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A flat smooth real function has no holomorphic extension near zero

Statement refuted

Every smooth real function near 0 is the restriction of a holomorphic function on some complex neighbourhood of 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function ψ:RR defined by ψ(0)=0 and ψ(x)=exp(1/x2) for x0.

[L1]

For every natural m and every real a>0, xm/exp(ax)0 as x+ (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +).

[L2]

The real exponential is smooth and every derivative equals the exponential (The exponential function is smooth and (exp)=exp).

[L6]

A differentiable real function is continuous at every point of differentiability (A function differentiable at c is continuous at c).

[L7]

A function is smooth when it is Ck for every natural k (Higher derivatives and the classes Ck and C).

[L8]

For every real x, exp(x)>0 and exp(x)=1/exp(x) (The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(x)=1/exp(x)).

[L9]

Every holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred open disc contained in its domain (A holomorphic function equals its Taylor series throughout the largest centred disc in its domain).

[L10]

If F(z)=n0cn(za)n near a, then cn=F(n)(a)/n! for every natural n (The coefficients of a complex power series are its derivatives at the centre divided by the corresponding factorials).

Counterexample

technique · contradiction
1.1

For x0, induction using [L2], [L3], [L4], and [L5] gives ψ(n)(x)=Pn(1/x)exp(1/x2) for a real polynomial Pn: P0=1, and differentiating one such expression produces another polynomial in 1/x times the same exponential.

L2L3L4L5givenalgebra
1.2

For every x0, [L8] gives ψ(x)=exp(1/x2)>0.

L8givenalgebra
2.1

Extend each expression in step 1.1 by the value 0 at x=0. By [L1], both Pn(1/x)exp(1/x2) and its difference quotient divided by x tend to 0 as x0 from either side. Inductively, every derivative exists at 0, equals 0, and is continuous there by [L6]; hence ψ is smooth by [L7].

step 1.1L1L6L7
3.1

Suppose, for contradiction, that a holomorphic function F on a complex neighbourhood of 0 agrees with ψ on a real interval about 0. Derivatives along the real axis then give F(n)(0)=ψ(n)(0)=0 for every natural n, and [L10] makes every Taylor coefficient of F at 0 equal to 0.

step 2.1L10assume-contra
4.1

By [L9], F equals that zero Taylor series on a complex disc about 0, so F vanishes there.

step 3.1L9
5.1

Every real interval about 0 contains a nonzero x, where step 1.2 gives F(x)=ψ(x)>0, contradicting step 4.1. Thus the smooth function ψ has no holomorphic extension to any complex neighbourhood of 0.

step 1.2step 4.1discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

50 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources