How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The sign of a quadratic Gauss sum needs a chosen primitive root
Statement refuted
"For a fixed odd prime the quadratic Gauss sum is independent of the choice of the primitive -th root of unity used to define it, so that its sign is a function of alone."
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The prime , a primitive third root of unity with , the second primitive third root , and the Gauss sums and attached to them (Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field).
In the cyclic group of third roots of unity the elements and are the two primitive third roots of unity, and (The -th roots of a complex number and the distinct roots of unity for every , The cyclotomic extension as a splitting field of ).
acts by for , so is an automorphism of and ( and ).
For every integer not divisible by , the automorphism of satisfies (Galois action on the quadratic Gauss sum); and while (The Legendre symbol, including its zero value).
For every odd prime , ; at this is , and the corresponding statement holds for because is again a primitive third root of unity (Square of the quadratic Gauss sum).
For an odd prime , is the unique intermediate field of of degree (Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum); at this is .
For the standard complex root one has (Quadratic Gauss sum at p=3).
Counterexample
Replacing the primitive root by rewrites the attached Gauss sum as , where ; the two sums are formed from two different primitive third roots of unity of the same field.
: the nonzero square class modulo is , and is a nonresidue modulo .
By [F4], , so and ; in particular will mean .
Applying [F3] with gives , so the Gauss sum changes sign when the primitive root is replaced by its square.
Steps 1.3 and 2.1 show , yet and ; thus the square of the Gauss sum and the field it generates are unchanged, while the sign of the sum depends on the chosen primitive root. In the standard complex embedding, gives by [F6], while the same computation with gives ; the value differs and no root-independent sign is well defined.
Remarks
- What remains canonical. Only the square and the field are independent of the chosen primitive root; the element itself is determined only up to the sign of the automorphism relating two chosen roots.
- No contradiction with the analytic sign theorem. Statements that fix a standard complex root (or an embedding together with a root) do determine the sign, e.g. here; the counterexample only refutes root-independence.
Depends on
- Quadratic Gauss sum in a prime cyclotomic field
- Galois action on the quadratic Gauss sum
- Square of the quadratic Gauss sum
- Quadratic subfield generated by the Gauss sum
- The Legendre symbol, including its zero value
- $[\mathbb Q(\zeta_n):\mathbb Q]=\varphi(n)$ and $\operatorname{Gal}(\mathbb Q(\mu_n)/\mathbb Q)\cong(\mathbb Z/n)^\times$
- The $n$-th roots of a complex number and the $n$ distinct roots of unity for every $n\ge1$
- Quadratic Gauss sum at p=3
- The cyclotomic extension $K(\mu_n)$ as a splitting field of $t^{n}-1$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Jerry Shurman, Math 361 Ninth Lecture, sections 2-4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Number Theory, Ch. 8, Example 8.19 (standard reference, not scraped)